Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town

This thesis contributes to the literature on the management of risk in pregnancy and birth, while examining the impact of technology in shaping risk configurations and articulating knowledge of the unborn. By adopting multiple perspectives on childbirth as a socio-cultural event, I argue that obstet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniels, Nicole Miriam
Other Authors: Moore, Elena
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Sociology 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613248098926592
access_status_str Open Access
author Daniels, Nicole Miriam
author2 Moore, Elena
author_browse Daniels, Nicole Miriam
Moore, Elena
author_facet Moore, Elena
Daniels, Nicole Miriam
author_sort Daniels, Nicole Miriam
collection Thesis
description This thesis contributes to the literature on the management of risk in pregnancy and birth, while examining the impact of technology in shaping risk configurations and articulating knowledge of the unborn. By adopting multiple perspectives on childbirth as a socio-cultural event, I argue that obstetric professional practices are active forces, shaping how pregnancy, childbirth and the unborn become known. Furthermore, a view of both social groups (i.e., obstetricians and pregnant persons) responsible for the management of risks to the unborn, highlights that respectable maternity as a cultural signifier is constructed in collusion with the precepts of medical science. A mixed approach to data collection, utilising a feminist, multisite ethnography helped uncover an interconnected web of relationships and made visible an architecture of risks. Findings are based on observations, indepth, longitudinal interviews, and participant observation with seven obstetricians, a lawyer, an academic, and fourteen pregnant women utilizing six private and one public hospital, obtained over a two-and-a-half-year period in Cape Town, South Africa. I consider various risk objects that configure the caring relationships and re/produce risk sensibilities between obstetricians (as the default caregivers in private sector, middle-class childbirth in South Africa), pregnant, and birthing persons, and the unborn. Obstetric risk objects are here understood to mediate the relationships that emerge between multiple entities and locate the order of importance of risks. Examining the function of high-risk birth as a boundary object, litigation and negligence as intra-acting objects and the unborn as maternal and obstetric work objects, I uncover a hierarchy of structural, organisational, and individual-level risks. I therefore address a gap in the literature on the sociology of risk in childbirth by connecting the top-down structure of power through which institutionalised risk disciplines and constrains behaviour, to the negotiation, and internalisation of risk in everyday life worlds. I thus link macro-structural, maternity systems-risk to meso- institutionalised risk to micro-every day, intimate-risk practices. I use socio-cultural and symbolic theories of risk to account for notions of purity and danger, risk and blame, and vulnerability and power in the configuration of a perfect obstetric professionalism safeguarding access to the sacred unborn. Through finely graded analytical work, woven through with transdisciplinary insights, including from African cosmologies and customary practices, I call for greater collective responsibility to the reproductive capacities that sustain and ensure continuity with all life on earth. Thus, using theory from the south, I propose that ambiguity moves theorisation about reproduction beyond binary positions and further, that it enables conceptions of the unborn to transcend notions of individual, right bearing self-hood. The findings reveal that the preparation, production, and performance of high-risk birth is an already inevitable configuration of private sector childbirth, which explains the exorbitant costs and high rates of interventions that are an obstinate, and historical feature of private sector maternity care in South Africa. High-risk birth is thereby paradoxically and complexly interlinked with the structural preparation of risk within the maternity sector, to its production within a highly at-risk, litigation averse obstetric profession, and to risks ritualised performance in intimate clinical encounters.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/35491
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:07.122Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Department of Sociology
publisherStr Department of Sociology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/35491 Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town Daniels, Nicole Miriam Moore, Elena Pande, Amrita Sociology This thesis contributes to the literature on the management of risk in pregnancy and birth, while examining the impact of technology in shaping risk configurations and articulating knowledge of the unborn. By adopting multiple perspectives on childbirth as a socio-cultural event, I argue that obstetric professional practices are active forces, shaping how pregnancy, childbirth and the unborn become known. Furthermore, a view of both social groups (i.e., obstetricians and pregnant persons) responsible for the management of risks to the unborn, highlights that respectable maternity as a cultural signifier is constructed in collusion with the precepts of medical science. A mixed approach to data collection, utilising a feminist, multisite ethnography helped uncover an interconnected web of relationships and made visible an architecture of risks. Findings are based on observations, indepth, longitudinal interviews, and participant observation with seven obstetricians, a lawyer, an academic, and fourteen pregnant women utilizing six private and one public hospital, obtained over a two-and-a-half-year period in Cape Town, South Africa. I consider various risk objects that configure the caring relationships and re/produce risk sensibilities between obstetricians (as the default caregivers in private sector, middle-class childbirth in South Africa), pregnant, and birthing persons, and the unborn. Obstetric risk objects are here understood to mediate the relationships that emerge between multiple entities and locate the order of importance of risks. Examining the function of high-risk birth as a boundary object, litigation and negligence as intra-acting objects and the unborn as maternal and obstetric work objects, I uncover a hierarchy of structural, organisational, and individual-level risks. I therefore address a gap in the literature on the sociology of risk in childbirth by connecting the top-down structure of power through which institutionalised risk disciplines and constrains behaviour, to the negotiation, and internalisation of risk in everyday life worlds. I thus link macro-structural, maternity systems-risk to meso- institutionalised risk to micro-every day, intimate-risk practices. I use socio-cultural and symbolic theories of risk to account for notions of purity and danger, risk and blame, and vulnerability and power in the configuration of a perfect obstetric professionalism safeguarding access to the sacred unborn. Through finely graded analytical work, woven through with transdisciplinary insights, including from African cosmologies and customary practices, I call for greater collective responsibility to the reproductive capacities that sustain and ensure continuity with all life on earth. Thus, using theory from the south, I propose that ambiguity moves theorisation about reproduction beyond binary positions and further, that it enables conceptions of the unborn to transcend notions of individual, right bearing self-hood. The findings reveal that the preparation, production, and performance of high-risk birth is an already inevitable configuration of private sector childbirth, which explains the exorbitant costs and high rates of interventions that are an obstinate, and historical feature of private sector maternity care in South Africa. High-risk birth is thereby paradoxically and complexly interlinked with the structural preparation of risk within the maternity sector, to its production within a highly at-risk, litigation averse obstetric profession, and to risks ritualised performance in intimate clinical encounters. 2022-01-18T07:44:11Z 2022-01-18T07:44:11Z 2021 2022-01-12T10:42:16Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35491 eng application/pdf Department of Sociology Faculty of Humanities
spellingShingle Sociology
Daniels, Nicole Miriam
Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town
title_full Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town
title_fullStr Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town
title_full_unstemmed Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town
title_short Obstetric-risk objects: a multi-site, feminist ethnography of private-sector obstetric, maternal and unborn, caring concerns in Cape Town
title_sort obstetric risk objects a multi site feminist ethnography of private sector obstetric maternal and unborn caring concerns in cape town
topic Sociology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35491
work_keys_str_mv AT danielsnicolemiriam obstetricriskobjectsamultisitefeministethnographyofprivatesectorobstetricmaternalandunborncaringconcernsincapetown