Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates

Wing shape and echolocation are two novel adaptations in the Chiroptera and are strongly influenced by environmental conditions. Wing shape is influenced by environmental clutter. Shorter, broader wings allow for more maneuverable flight, and are advantageous for bats living in highly cluttered envi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duncan, Aurora
Other Authors: Jacobs, David
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Biological Sciences 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613164465553408
access_status_str Open Access
author Duncan, Aurora
author2 Jacobs, David
author_browse Duncan, Aurora
Jacobs, David
author_facet Jacobs, David
Duncan, Aurora
author_sort Duncan, Aurora
collection Thesis
description Wing shape and echolocation are two novel adaptations in the Chiroptera and are strongly influenced by environmental conditions. Wing shape is influenced by environmental clutter. Shorter, broader wings allow for more maneuverable flight, and are advantageous for bats living in highly cluttered environments. Longer, narrower wings help bats to increase flight speed, and are best suited for bats living in more open environments. It is likely that wing shape is also influenced by temperature, given the potential for wings to act as thermoregulatory appendages. Wings provide a thermal gradient across their surfaces, dissipating excess heat from the body. However, the importance in thermoregulation in determining wing size is unknown. If thermoregulation is a strong selective pressure, bats in hotter, more arid regions should have larger wings. Environmental conditions also influence echolocation pulse design. Echolocation pulses must successfully reach a target and generate an audible echo despite atmospheric attenuation. High-duty cycle (HDC) pulses, calls with longer durations than the interval between them, are particularly useful in environments with high amount of environmental clutter. HDC echolocators use an acoustic fovea and Doppler shift compensation to detect the fluttering wings of insect prey in dense vegetation. However, the flexibility of these pulses is limited by the bat's acoustic fovea. Wing shape and echolocation combined form an adaptive complex, providing bats with a highly specialized system of foraging. Climate change poses an enormous risk to a bat's foraging success, because rising ambient temperatures are likely to change the selective pressures on wing size (due to the potential thermoregulatory benefits) as well as prey detection volumes of the bat's echolocation (because sound propagation is influenced by temperature). As an adaptive complex any selection on either wings or echolocation is likely to influence changes in the other, with consequences for the foraging efficiency of bats. The potential impact of climate change on the foraging efficiency of bats can be gauged by the bats' adaptive responses to different climatic conditions over their geographic range. I examined these two traits in different localities across the geographic range of the Cape horseshoe bat, R. capensis to determine if wing and echolocation parameters are adapted to current climatic conditions. I measured wing area and echolocation parameters at sites within the distribution of R. capensis that were representative of the different climates across its range. I measured wing areas using digital image analysis software, and I measured echolocation parameters using a microphone array system. Temperature was a predictor in the top fitting linear mixed effects models for both wing area and prey detection volume. For differences in wing area, body mass was the only significant explanatory variable. However, body mass may itself be influenced by environmental conditions. NDVI, latitude, and average winter minimum temperature significantly related to differences in prey detection volume. My results indicate geographic variation in both wing area and prey detection volume, an indication that these traits are adapted to local climate conditions. Geographic variation in wing area is a consequence of body mass, which may or may not be a function of climate. However, geographic variation in prey detection volume is directly influenced by the environment. Therefore, increases in ambient temperature due to human-induced climate change are likely to have an effect on the foraging efficiency of R. capensis.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/35720
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:47.142Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Department of Biological Sciences
publisherStr Department of Biological Sciences
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/35720 Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates Duncan, Aurora Jacobs, David Evolution ERA5 sensory traits Wing shape and echolocation are two novel adaptations in the Chiroptera and are strongly influenced by environmental conditions. Wing shape is influenced by environmental clutter. Shorter, broader wings allow for more maneuverable flight, and are advantageous for bats living in highly cluttered environments. Longer, narrower wings help bats to increase flight speed, and are best suited for bats living in more open environments. It is likely that wing shape is also influenced by temperature, given the potential for wings to act as thermoregulatory appendages. Wings provide a thermal gradient across their surfaces, dissipating excess heat from the body. However, the importance in thermoregulation in determining wing size is unknown. If thermoregulation is a strong selective pressure, bats in hotter, more arid regions should have larger wings. Environmental conditions also influence echolocation pulse design. Echolocation pulses must successfully reach a target and generate an audible echo despite atmospheric attenuation. High-duty cycle (HDC) pulses, calls with longer durations than the interval between them, are particularly useful in environments with high amount of environmental clutter. HDC echolocators use an acoustic fovea and Doppler shift compensation to detect the fluttering wings of insect prey in dense vegetation. However, the flexibility of these pulses is limited by the bat's acoustic fovea. Wing shape and echolocation combined form an adaptive complex, providing bats with a highly specialized system of foraging. Climate change poses an enormous risk to a bat's foraging success, because rising ambient temperatures are likely to change the selective pressures on wing size (due to the potential thermoregulatory benefits) as well as prey detection volumes of the bat's echolocation (because sound propagation is influenced by temperature). As an adaptive complex any selection on either wings or echolocation is likely to influence changes in the other, with consequences for the foraging efficiency of bats. The potential impact of climate change on the foraging efficiency of bats can be gauged by the bats' adaptive responses to different climatic conditions over their geographic range. I examined these two traits in different localities across the geographic range of the Cape horseshoe bat, R. capensis to determine if wing and echolocation parameters are adapted to current climatic conditions. I measured wing area and echolocation parameters at sites within the distribution of R. capensis that were representative of the different climates across its range. I measured wing areas using digital image analysis software, and I measured echolocation parameters using a microphone array system. Temperature was a predictor in the top fitting linear mixed effects models for both wing area and prey detection volume. For differences in wing area, body mass was the only significant explanatory variable. However, body mass may itself be influenced by environmental conditions. NDVI, latitude, and average winter minimum temperature significantly related to differences in prey detection volume. My results indicate geographic variation in both wing area and prey detection volume, an indication that these traits are adapted to local climate conditions. Geographic variation in wing area is a consequence of body mass, which may or may not be a function of climate. However, geographic variation in prey detection volume is directly influenced by the environment. Therefore, increases in ambient temperature due to human-induced climate change are likely to have an effect on the foraging efficiency of R. capensis. 2022-02-18T06:29:39Z 2022-02-18T06:29:39Z 2021 2022-02-10T09:42:50Z Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35720 eng application/pdf Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science
spellingShingle Evolution
ERA5
sensory traits
Duncan, Aurora
Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates
title_full Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates
title_fullStr Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates
title_full_unstemmed Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates
title_short Variation in wing area and prey detection volume of Rhinolophus Capensis in response to different climates
title_sort variation in wing area and prey detection volume of rhinolophus capensis in response to different climates
topic Evolution
ERA5
sensory traits
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/35720
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanaurora variationinwingareaandpreydetectionvolumeofrhinolophuscapensisinresponsetodifferentclimates