Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil

The metaphors used when speaking of equity are rather colourful. One reads, amused, of the ‘burning issue', the ‘shibboleth' and the ‘sacred cow'. But these metaphors, used as they are in a discipline which tends away from the dramatic in its everyday formulations, only lend more emphasis to the gra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: van Wijk, Andrew Murray
Other Authors: Hutchison, Dale
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Commercial Law 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614185639116800
access_status_str Open Access
author van Wijk, Andrew Murray
author2 Hutchison, Dale
author_browse Hutchison, Dale
van Wijk, Andrew Murray
author_facet Hutchison, Dale
van Wijk, Andrew Murray
author_sort van Wijk, Andrew Murray
collection Thesis
description The metaphors used when speaking of equity are rather colourful. One reads, amused, of the ‘burning issue', the ‘shibboleth' and the ‘sacred cow'. But these metaphors, used as they are in a discipline which tends away from the dramatic in its everyday formulations, only lend more emphasis to the gravity of the quandary. A widening gap between views on the proper method for the judicial control of contract, be it a balanced public policy or unfettered equity, caused true discordance between the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court, our two highest courts. In Beadica 231 CC and Others v Trustees, Oregon Trust and Others 2020 (5) SA 247 (CC) the Constitutional Court largely settled matters when it came down on the side of public policy. This no doubt caused surprise in some quarters, given its dicta in earlier cases. Nevertheless it settled the question of which legal device was to be used. Public policy is to have sole mandate and the ‘burning issue' was, apparently, doused. As to the nature of this legal device, it is a truism that the content of public policy changes with the times, but in the constitutional republic that South Africa is today the Constitution is an unassailable source of its content and values. This makes our interpretation of what it demands in the contractual context of huge import. The tension meant that instead of the cut and thrust of hard precedent, cases were largely evaluated for their tendency to reflect the increasing public facet to this most cloistered sanctum of private law. Brought back to the challenge in Beadica, this study traces in Chapters II and II something that went largely unnoticed in the shadow of the contract tectonics then on the move: the historical antecedents and theoretical underpinnings of the public interest aspect of public policy had culminated in a tension with separate legal personality. In Beadica the parties were juristic persons yet claimed the benefit of historical, substantive equality in their contractual affairs. This claim was weighed but found wanting in the Constitutional Court - but it is this ember, the implications of the corporate veil being lifted in the evaluation of equality, that represents, if not something new, then the confirmation of what some have long argued for - or suspected. Chapter IV accordingly argues that Beadica is a confirmation of the imperative of substantive equality in the contractual context, albeit that the bar has been set very high in light of the dangers. Chapter V briefly explores the adjacent legal routes by which similar outcomes could be reached before reflecting on the general historical treatment that is the bedrock of this piece.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36353
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:48:01.800Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Department of Commercial Law
publisherStr Department of Commercial Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36353 Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil van Wijk, Andrew Murray Hutchison, Dale Commercial Law The metaphors used when speaking of equity are rather colourful. One reads, amused, of the ‘burning issue', the ‘shibboleth' and the ‘sacred cow'. But these metaphors, used as they are in a discipline which tends away from the dramatic in its everyday formulations, only lend more emphasis to the gravity of the quandary. A widening gap between views on the proper method for the judicial control of contract, be it a balanced public policy or unfettered equity, caused true discordance between the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court, our two highest courts. In Beadica 231 CC and Others v Trustees, Oregon Trust and Others 2020 (5) SA 247 (CC) the Constitutional Court largely settled matters when it came down on the side of public policy. This no doubt caused surprise in some quarters, given its dicta in earlier cases. Nevertheless it settled the question of which legal device was to be used. Public policy is to have sole mandate and the ‘burning issue' was, apparently, doused. As to the nature of this legal device, it is a truism that the content of public policy changes with the times, but in the constitutional republic that South Africa is today the Constitution is an unassailable source of its content and values. This makes our interpretation of what it demands in the contractual context of huge import. The tension meant that instead of the cut and thrust of hard precedent, cases were largely evaluated for their tendency to reflect the increasing public facet to this most cloistered sanctum of private law. Brought back to the challenge in Beadica, this study traces in Chapters II and II something that went largely unnoticed in the shadow of the contract tectonics then on the move: the historical antecedents and theoretical underpinnings of the public interest aspect of public policy had culminated in a tension with separate legal personality. In Beadica the parties were juristic persons yet claimed the benefit of historical, substantive equality in their contractual affairs. This claim was weighed but found wanting in the Constitutional Court - but it is this ember, the implications of the corporate veil being lifted in the evaluation of equality, that represents, if not something new, then the confirmation of what some have long argued for - or suspected. Chapter IV accordingly argues that Beadica is a confirmation of the imperative of substantive equality in the contractual context, albeit that the bar has been set very high in light of the dangers. Chapter V briefly explores the adjacent legal routes by which similar outcomes could be reached before reflecting on the general historical treatment that is the bedrock of this piece. 2022-04-13T07:54:35Z 2022-04-13T07:54:35Z 2021 2022-04-13T07:54:01Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36353 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law
spellingShingle Commercial Law
van Wijk, Andrew Murray
Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil
title_full Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil
title_fullStr Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil
title_full_unstemmed Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil
title_short Beneath the burning issue of Beadica: public policy and context astride the corporate veil
title_sort beneath the burning issue of beadica public policy and context astride the corporate veil
topic Commercial Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36353
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwijkandrewmurray beneaththeburningissueofbeadicapublicpolicyandcontextastridethecorporateveil