Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi

The regulatory and supervisory framework of financial co-operatives in South Africa consists of the Cooperatives Act (No. 14 of 2005), the Co-operatives Bank Act (No. 40 of 2007), Banks Act Exemption (Notice 620 of 2014) and the Financial Sector Regulation Act (No. 9 of 2017). In Malawi, the regulat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gondwe, Ruth
Other Authors: Hutchison, Andrew
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Commercial Law 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613178817413120
access_status_str Open Access
author Gondwe, Ruth
author2 Hutchison, Andrew
author_browse Gondwe, Ruth
Hutchison, Andrew
author_facet Hutchison, Andrew
Gondwe, Ruth
author_sort Gondwe, Ruth
collection Thesis
description The regulatory and supervisory framework of financial co-operatives in South Africa consists of the Cooperatives Act (No. 14 of 2005), the Co-operatives Bank Act (No. 40 of 2007), Banks Act Exemption (Notice 620 of 2014) and the Financial Sector Regulation Act (No. 9 of 2017). In Malawi, the regulatory and supervisory framework of financial co-operatives consists of the Financial Services Act (No. 26 of 2010) and the Financial Co-operatives Act (No. 8 of 2011). This thesis proposes that the regulatory and supervisory frameworks provided by these pieces of legislation in both South Africa and Malawi do not adequately regulate the sector and that this in turn, one of the main contributing factors to the slow growth of financial co-operatives in the respective countries. On the one hand, the frameworks over-regulate some aspects of the financial co-operatives sector. This overregulation has created a harsh regulatory environment for some financial co-operatives. On the other hand, some aspects of the financial co-operatives sector are underregulated. Under-regulation has resulted in regulatory arbitrage and oversight of the fact that financial co-operatives have economic objectives, ownership structures, risks, and challenges unique to them. Interestingly, although such gaps and overcompensations in the frameworks have hindered the growth of formal and semi-formal financial co-operatives, they have fostered the growth of informal financial cooperatives. Accordingly, in both countries, there is an overwhelmingly large sector of informal financial co-operatives. Informal financial co-operatives are not governed by formal pieces of legislation. Rather, they are governed by indigenous law, or as otherwise termed, the law of the people. This thesis postulates that the overregulation and under-regulation embedded in the current regulatory and supervisory frameworks have been birthed from a misunderstanding of what financial co-operatives are and how they ought to function; an infusion of unfavourable historical and political influences and practices into the current regulatory and supervisory frameworks; overdependence of external aid; and lastly, an underestimation of the competencies of the citizens in both countries. The aim of this thesis is not to suggest supplanting of the current formal frameworks in South Africa and Malawi, or an adoption of informal governance structures. Instead, this thesis aims to provide recommendations for legal reform within the current framework. It aims to propose how, if possible, or required, the relevant laws in South Africa and Malawi might be changed, reformed or developed within their existing frame of reference.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36775
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:00.945Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Department of Commercial Law
publisherStr Department of Commercial Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36775 Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi Gondwe, Ruth Hutchison, Andrew Commercial Law The regulatory and supervisory framework of financial co-operatives in South Africa consists of the Cooperatives Act (No. 14 of 2005), the Co-operatives Bank Act (No. 40 of 2007), Banks Act Exemption (Notice 620 of 2014) and the Financial Sector Regulation Act (No. 9 of 2017). In Malawi, the regulatory and supervisory framework of financial co-operatives consists of the Financial Services Act (No. 26 of 2010) and the Financial Co-operatives Act (No. 8 of 2011). This thesis proposes that the regulatory and supervisory frameworks provided by these pieces of legislation in both South Africa and Malawi do not adequately regulate the sector and that this in turn, one of the main contributing factors to the slow growth of financial co-operatives in the respective countries. On the one hand, the frameworks over-regulate some aspects of the financial co-operatives sector. This overregulation has created a harsh regulatory environment for some financial co-operatives. On the other hand, some aspects of the financial co-operatives sector are underregulated. Under-regulation has resulted in regulatory arbitrage and oversight of the fact that financial co-operatives have economic objectives, ownership structures, risks, and challenges unique to them. Interestingly, although such gaps and overcompensations in the frameworks have hindered the growth of formal and semi-formal financial co-operatives, they have fostered the growth of informal financial cooperatives. Accordingly, in both countries, there is an overwhelmingly large sector of informal financial co-operatives. Informal financial co-operatives are not governed by formal pieces of legislation. Rather, they are governed by indigenous law, or as otherwise termed, the law of the people. This thesis postulates that the overregulation and under-regulation embedded in the current regulatory and supervisory frameworks have been birthed from a misunderstanding of what financial co-operatives are and how they ought to function; an infusion of unfavourable historical and political influences and practices into the current regulatory and supervisory frameworks; overdependence of external aid; and lastly, an underestimation of the competencies of the citizens in both countries. The aim of this thesis is not to suggest supplanting of the current formal frameworks in South Africa and Malawi, or an adoption of informal governance structures. Instead, this thesis aims to provide recommendations for legal reform within the current framework. It aims to propose how, if possible, or required, the relevant laws in South Africa and Malawi might be changed, reformed or developed within their existing frame of reference. 2022-08-30T10:00:12Z 2022-08-30T10:00:12Z 2022 2022-08-26T07:31:31Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36775 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law
spellingShingle Commercial Law
Gondwe, Ruth
Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi
title_full Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi
title_fullStr Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi
title_short Financial cooperatives: regulatory and supervisory answers for South Africa and Malawi
title_sort financial cooperatives regulatory and supervisory answers for south africa and malawi
topic Commercial Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36775
work_keys_str_mv AT gondweruth financialcooperativesregulatoryandsupervisoryanswersforsouthafricaandmalawi