Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma

Background: Selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) is routine at our centre. The aim of this observational study is to report the outcomes of patients who have failed SNOM. Methods: All patients for the period (May 2015 – January 2018) who presented with penet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Almgla, Naser Khalifa
Other Authors: Navsaria, Pradeep
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Division of General Surgery 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613266964905984
access_status_str Open Access
author Almgla, Naser Khalifa
author2 Navsaria, Pradeep
author_browse Almgla, Naser Khalifa
Navsaria, Pradeep
author_facet Navsaria, Pradeep
Almgla, Naser Khalifa
author_sort Almgla, Naser Khalifa
collection Thesis
description Background: Selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) is routine at our centre. The aim of this observational study is to report the outcomes of patients who have failed SNOM. Methods: All patients for the period (May 2015 – January 2018) who presented with penetrating abdominal trauma were reviewed. The patients were categorised into two groups: immediate laparotomy and delayed operative management (DOM) groups. The outcomes of the two groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications as a primary outcome, mortality and length of hospital stay as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 944 patients with PAT were managed over the 33-month study period. After excluding 100 patients undergoing damage control surgery; 402 (47.6%) and 542 (52.4%) patients were treated with SNOM and immediate laparotomy, respectively. In the NOM cohort, 359 (89.3%) were managed successfully without laparotomy. Thirty-seven (86.0%) patients in the DOM group had a therapeutic laparotomy and six (14.0%) had an unnecessary laparotomy. Nine (20.9%) patients in the DOM group developed complications. There was no significant difference in the complication rates between the immediate laparotomy and DOM group. The hospital length of stay (LOS) was comparable between the two groups. There was no mortality reported in the SNOM group. Conclusion: Delayed laparotomy for PAT in patients initially selected for NOM, irrespective of mechanism, results in morbidity, mortality and hospital stay comparable to those who underwent immediate laparotomy.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36979
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:25.185Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Division of General Surgery
publisherStr Division of General Surgery
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36979 Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma Almgla, Naser Khalifa Navsaria, Pradeep Surgery Background: Selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) is routine at our centre. The aim of this observational study is to report the outcomes of patients who have failed SNOM. Methods: All patients for the period (May 2015 – January 2018) who presented with penetrating abdominal trauma were reviewed. The patients were categorised into two groups: immediate laparotomy and delayed operative management (DOM) groups. The outcomes of the two groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications as a primary outcome, mortality and length of hospital stay as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 944 patients with PAT were managed over the 33-month study period. After excluding 100 patients undergoing damage control surgery; 402 (47.6%) and 542 (52.4%) patients were treated with SNOM and immediate laparotomy, respectively. In the NOM cohort, 359 (89.3%) were managed successfully without laparotomy. Thirty-seven (86.0%) patients in the DOM group had a therapeutic laparotomy and six (14.0%) had an unnecessary laparotomy. Nine (20.9%) patients in the DOM group developed complications. There was no significant difference in the complication rates between the immediate laparotomy and DOM group. The hospital length of stay (LOS) was comparable between the two groups. There was no mortality reported in the SNOM group. Conclusion: Delayed laparotomy for PAT in patients initially selected for NOM, irrespective of mechanism, results in morbidity, mortality and hospital stay comparable to those who underwent immediate laparotomy. 2023-02-22T12:17:55Z 2023-02-22T12:17:55Z 2022 2023-02-20T12:10:51Z Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36979 eng application/pdf Division of General Surgery Faculty of Health Sciences
spellingShingle Surgery
Almgla, Naser Khalifa
Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma
title_full Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma
title_fullStr Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma
title_short Outcomes of failure of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma
title_sort outcomes of failure of selective non operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma
topic Surgery
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36979
work_keys_str_mv AT almglanaserkhalifa outcomesoffailureofselectivenonoperativemanagementofpenetratingabdominaltrauma