Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review

Background Data is central to healthcare system improvement. Perioperative registries can be utilised for quality improvement initiatives through tracking outcomes, developing risk prediction models, and supporting policymakers and health professionals in making evidence-based decisions and interven...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Belachew, Fitsum Kifle
Other Authors: Biccard, Bruce
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Division of General Surgery 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613328412508160
access_status_str Open Access
author Belachew, Fitsum Kifle
author2 Biccard, Bruce
author_browse Belachew, Fitsum Kifle
Biccard, Bruce
author_facet Biccard, Bruce
Belachew, Fitsum Kifle
author_sort Belachew, Fitsum Kifle
collection Thesis
description Background Data is central to healthcare system improvement. Perioperative registries can be utilised for quality improvement initiatives through tracking outcomes, developing risk prediction models, and supporting policymakers and health professionals in making evidence-based decisions and interventions. This is particularly desirable in low-resource settings, where there is an unmet surgical demand and patients have a mortality rate up to double that of high-income countries. To better understand and support initiatives to establish clinical registries, this study aimed to assess the indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful perioperative registries in low-resource settings from the available literature on perioperative registry implementations. Materials and Methods We conducted a librarian-assisted literature search of international research databases; PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and WHOLIS WHO Library Database of articles published between January 1969 to January 2021 using controlled subject headings and keywords. Studies were filtered using predefined criteria and responses to two Mixed Method Appraisal Tool screening questions. A Direct Content Analysis Method was used to synthesize data for eligible studies based on predefined criteria. Results The search identified 2793 abstracts, with ten studies included after removing duplicates and excluding studies that did not meet eligibility criteria. Three were conducted in South America, four in Africa, two in the Middle East, and one in Asia. The lack of context-specific data for determining and evaluating patient outcomes (n=7) was the major indication for implementing registries. Organizing local research teams and engaging stakeholders in the host country was associated with successful implementation. However, inadequate funding to hire data collectors and monitor data quality was identified as a major challenge (n=4). Conclusion The goal of a perioperative registry is to generate data to influence and support quality improvement, and national surgical policies. Efforts to establish perioperative registries must continue while adhering to local ethical practices and broader principles and should consider those characteristics associated with successful registry implementation identified in this review.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37416
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:23.309Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Division of General Surgery
publisherStr Division of General Surgery
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37416 Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review Belachew, Fitsum Kifle Biccard, Bruce Medicine Background Data is central to healthcare system improvement. Perioperative registries can be utilised for quality improvement initiatives through tracking outcomes, developing risk prediction models, and supporting policymakers and health professionals in making evidence-based decisions and interventions. This is particularly desirable in low-resource settings, where there is an unmet surgical demand and patients have a mortality rate up to double that of high-income countries. To better understand and support initiatives to establish clinical registries, this study aimed to assess the indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful perioperative registries in low-resource settings from the available literature on perioperative registry implementations. Materials and Methods We conducted a librarian-assisted literature search of international research databases; PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and WHOLIS WHO Library Database of articles published between January 1969 to January 2021 using controlled subject headings and keywords. Studies were filtered using predefined criteria and responses to two Mixed Method Appraisal Tool screening questions. A Direct Content Analysis Method was used to synthesize data for eligible studies based on predefined criteria. Results The search identified 2793 abstracts, with ten studies included after removing duplicates and excluding studies that did not meet eligibility criteria. Three were conducted in South America, four in Africa, two in the Middle East, and one in Asia. The lack of context-specific data for determining and evaluating patient outcomes (n=7) was the major indication for implementing registries. Organizing local research teams and engaging stakeholders in the host country was associated with successful implementation. However, inadequate funding to hire data collectors and monitor data quality was identified as a major challenge (n=4). Conclusion The goal of a perioperative registry is to generate data to influence and support quality improvement, and national surgical policies. Efforts to establish perioperative registries must continue while adhering to local ethical practices and broader principles and should consider those characteristics associated with successful registry implementation identified in this review. 2023-03-13T13:48:17Z 2023-03-13T13:48:17Z 2022 2023-02-20T12:17:20Z Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37416 eng application/pdf Division of General Surgery Faculty of Health Sciences
spellingShingle Medicine
Belachew, Fitsum Kifle
Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review
title_full Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review
title_fullStr Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review
title_short Indications, challenges, and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings: A systematic review
title_sort indications challenges and characteristics of successful implementation of perioperative registries in low resource settings a systematic review
topic Medicine
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37416
work_keys_str_mv AT belachewfitsumkifle indicationschallengesandcharacteristicsofsuccessfulimplementationofperioperativeregistriesinlowresourcesettingsasystematicreview