Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Defending women who kill

This dissertation undertakes a case review of South African court case judgments (between 1994 and 2021) in which women are charged with killing their abusive intimate partners. The dissertation examines how evidence of their abuse is used in respect of legal defences and mitigation of sentence. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shaff, Maxine Leslie Georgia
Other Authors: Phelps, Kelly
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613746162040832
access_status_str Open Access
author Shaff, Maxine Leslie Georgia
author2 Phelps, Kelly
author_browse Phelps, Kelly
Shaff, Maxine Leslie Georgia
author_facet Phelps, Kelly
Shaff, Maxine Leslie Georgia
author_sort Shaff, Maxine Leslie Georgia
collection Thesis
description This dissertation undertakes a case review of South African court case judgments (between 1994 and 2021) in which women are charged with killing their abusive intimate partners. The dissertation examines how evidence of their abuse is used in respect of legal defences and mitigation of sentence. In addition to analysing the existing legal framework, the paper presents thematic qualitative information drawn from the judgments to show that a number of themes are apparent in the manner in which evidence is brought and dealt with by the courts. For instance, patterns of disregarding evidence of abuse, and a lack of calling for further evidence where needed. In addition to this, judgments often 'play armchair expert' and show lack of sensitivity and compassion to abused women - this is tightly linked with the concept of victim blaming. Other themes include deterrence as emphasised in sentencing, the notion of a turning point during an abusive spell, the rights of the children involved in abusive relationships, and considering motives for retaliation. The paper concludes by arguing that a contemporary approach to private defence, in light of the developments made in the Engelbrecht case, ought to be the way forward in exonerating women of their criminal culpability where those requirements are met.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37813
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:41:02.682Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37813 Defending women who kill Shaff, Maxine Leslie Georgia Phelps, Kelly Moult, Kelley public law This dissertation undertakes a case review of South African court case judgments (between 1994 and 2021) in which women are charged with killing their abusive intimate partners. The dissertation examines how evidence of their abuse is used in respect of legal defences and mitigation of sentence. In addition to analysing the existing legal framework, the paper presents thematic qualitative information drawn from the judgments to show that a number of themes are apparent in the manner in which evidence is brought and dealt with by the courts. For instance, patterns of disregarding evidence of abuse, and a lack of calling for further evidence where needed. In addition to this, judgments often 'play armchair expert' and show lack of sensitivity and compassion to abused women - this is tightly linked with the concept of victim blaming. Other themes include deterrence as emphasised in sentencing, the notion of a turning point during an abusive spell, the rights of the children involved in abusive relationships, and considering motives for retaliation. The paper concludes by arguing that a contemporary approach to private defence, in light of the developments made in the Engelbrecht case, ought to be the way forward in exonerating women of their criminal culpability where those requirements are met. 2023-04-21T07:49:46Z 2023-04-21T07:49:46Z 2022 2023-04-21T07:49:16Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37813 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law
spellingShingle public law
Shaff, Maxine Leslie Georgia
Defending women who kill
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Defending women who kill
title_full Defending women who kill
title_fullStr Defending women who kill
title_full_unstemmed Defending women who kill
title_short Defending women who kill
title_sort defending women who kill
topic public law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37813
work_keys_str_mv AT shaffmaxinelesliegeorgia defendingwomenwhokill