Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
We explore the concept of financial market state discovery by assessing the robustness of two unsupervised machine learning algorithms: Inverse Covariance Clustering (ICC) and Agglomerative Super Paramagnetic Clustering (ASPC). The assessment is carried out by: simulating market datasets varying in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Statistical Sciences
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | We explore the concept of financial market state discovery by assessing the robustness of two unsupervised machine learning algorithms: Inverse Covariance Clustering (ICC) and Agglomerative Super Paramagnetic Clustering (ASPC). The assessment is carried out by: simulating market datasets varying in complexity; implementing ICC and ASPC to estimate the underlying states (using only simulated log-returns as inputs); and measuring the algorithms' ability to recover the underlying states, using the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) as a performance metric. Experiments revealed that ASPC is a more robust and better performing algorithm than ICC. ICC is able to produce competitive results in 2-state markets; however, ICC's primary disadvantage is its inability to maintain strong performance in 3, 4 and 5-state markets. For example, ASPC produced ARI numbers that were up to 800% superior to ICC in 5-state markets. Furthermore, ASPC does not rely on the art of selecting good hyper-parameters such as, the number of states a priori. ICC's utility as a market state discovery algorithm is limited. |
|---|