Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments?
Inequality and injustice are deeply rooted within the South African mining industry, and have been since at least the discovery of commercially viable diamonds in 1868, followed by gold in 1886. From the labour policies of the past, the effects of globalisation, and the dysfunctional labour relation...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Commercial Law
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613323074207744 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Mudimu,Godknows |
| author2 | Fergus, Emma |
| author_browse | Fergus, Emma Mudimu,Godknows |
| author_facet | Fergus, Emma Mudimu,Godknows |
| author_sort | Mudimu,Godknows |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Inequality and injustice are deeply rooted within the South African mining industry, and have been since at least the discovery of commercially viable diamonds in 1868, followed by gold in 1886. From the labour policies of the past, the effects of globalisation, and the dysfunctional labour relationships on many mines (as depicted by the Marikana tragedy of 2012) arise mismatched regulatory patterns on labour relations. Labour patterns in the mining sector are continuously shifting, yet the foundations of labour regulation have remained largely the same, focusing primarily on protecting employees who are in a standard employment relationship at the expense of non-standard workers. This has left many workers in non-standard employment relationships inadequately protected by the labour framework. Nonstandard mineworkers generally lack full-enabling rights, including the ability to exercise their rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining effectively. In addition, they face challenges when exercising their right to a working environment that is not harmful to their health and safety, leading to the worsening of their already dire socio-economic conditions. The state is battling to protect these workers from exploitation, but continues to legislate, primarily attempting to widen the definition of those who qualify to access rights under the legal framework. Notwithstanding these attempts, numerous workers at mines remain inadequately protected, thereby stimulating regulatory debates on new ways of organising non-standard workers. One such mechanism, which continues to gather traction in the regulatory debates is the use of codes of conduct to offer protection to workers who, by virtue of the arrangements of their work, cannot organise or access the full rights under the applicable legal framework. Codes of conduct have been popular in many sectors, such as the apparel industry but have not been fully tested in the mining context, leaving many questions around whether they can be labelled genuine regulatory instruments or whether they are mere window dressing tools. Through an assessment of codes of conduct, tracing their development, place in the regulatory spectrum and usage by mining companies in South African mines, this thesis assesses their effectiveness in protecting non-standard workers' rights. Questions on whether such instruments can be viewed as genuine complementary regulatory instruments are raised, focusing on the weaknesses of these instruments. This dissertation offers recommendations for redesigning codes of conduct to make them more legitimate, effective and democratic instruments in the regulation of labour standards at mines. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37821 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:34:17.944Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Department of Commercial Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Commercial Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37821 The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments? Mudimu,Godknows Fergus, Emma Mostert, Hanri commercial law Inequality and injustice are deeply rooted within the South African mining industry, and have been since at least the discovery of commercially viable diamonds in 1868, followed by gold in 1886. From the labour policies of the past, the effects of globalisation, and the dysfunctional labour relationships on many mines (as depicted by the Marikana tragedy of 2012) arise mismatched regulatory patterns on labour relations. Labour patterns in the mining sector are continuously shifting, yet the foundations of labour regulation have remained largely the same, focusing primarily on protecting employees who are in a standard employment relationship at the expense of non-standard workers. This has left many workers in non-standard employment relationships inadequately protected by the labour framework. Nonstandard mineworkers generally lack full-enabling rights, including the ability to exercise their rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining effectively. In addition, they face challenges when exercising their right to a working environment that is not harmful to their health and safety, leading to the worsening of their already dire socio-economic conditions. The state is battling to protect these workers from exploitation, but continues to legislate, primarily attempting to widen the definition of those who qualify to access rights under the legal framework. Notwithstanding these attempts, numerous workers at mines remain inadequately protected, thereby stimulating regulatory debates on new ways of organising non-standard workers. One such mechanism, which continues to gather traction in the regulatory debates is the use of codes of conduct to offer protection to workers who, by virtue of the arrangements of their work, cannot organise or access the full rights under the applicable legal framework. Codes of conduct have been popular in many sectors, such as the apparel industry but have not been fully tested in the mining context, leaving many questions around whether they can be labelled genuine regulatory instruments or whether they are mere window dressing tools. Through an assessment of codes of conduct, tracing their development, place in the regulatory spectrum and usage by mining companies in South African mines, this thesis assesses their effectiveness in protecting non-standard workers' rights. Questions on whether such instruments can be viewed as genuine complementary regulatory instruments are raised, focusing on the weaknesses of these instruments. This dissertation offers recommendations for redesigning codes of conduct to make them more legitimate, effective and democratic instruments in the regulation of labour standards at mines. 2023-04-25T11:38:37Z 2023-04-25T11:38:37Z 2021 2023-04-25T11:37:29Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37821 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law |
| spellingShingle | commercial law Mudimu,Godknows The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments? |
| thesis_degree_str | Doctoral |
| title | The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments? |
| title_full | The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments? |
| title_fullStr | The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments? |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments? |
| title_short | The effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected South African mining companies in regulating labour standards: window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments? |
| title_sort | effectiveness of codes of conduct of selected south african mining companies in regulating labour standards window dressing or genuine regulatory instruments |
| topic | commercial law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37821 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mudimugodknows theeffectivenessofcodesofconductofselectedsouthafricanminingcompaniesinregulatinglabourstandardswindowdressingorgenuineregulatoryinstruments AT mudimugodknows effectivenessofcodesofconductofselectedsouthafricanminingcompaniesinregulatinglabourstandardswindowdressingorgenuineregulatoryinstruments |