Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The density of leopards in a mixed-use landscape in the Western Cape, South Africa
Large carnivores face numerous threats, including habitat loss and fragmentation, direct killing, and prey depletion, leading to significant global range and population declines. Despite these threats, leopards (Panthera pardus) persist outside protected areas throughout most of their range, occupyi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Biological Sciences
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Large carnivores face numerous threats, including habitat loss and fragmentation, direct killing, and prey depletion, leading to significant global range and population declines. Despite these threats, leopards (Panthera pardus) persist outside protected areas throughout most of their range, occupying a diverse range of habitat types and land uses, including peri-urban and rural areas. Our understanding of leopard population dynamics in mixed-use landscapes is limited, especially in South Africa, where most research has focused on protected areas. Here I use spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) models on camera trap data to estimate how leopard density varies across a mixed-use landscape of protected areas, farmland, and urban areas in the Overberg region of the Western Cape, South Africa. Data were derived from 86 paired camera stations, which collected data for 161 camera trap nights, providing 221 independent leopard captures at 50 camera trap stations. A total of 25 individual leopards were identified, and the best-performing SECR model included the covariate sex on the σ (spatial decay), and a combination of sex, vegetation type and the interaction on λ0 (capture probability), with a density estimate of 0.64 leopards per 100 km2 . Elevation, terrain ruggedness, protected area status and NDVI were all important drivers of leopard density in the region, with leopard density highest on elevated remnants of natural land outside of protected areas. These results are similar to previous research findings in the Western Cape, where high-lying natural vegetation was shown to serve as both a refuge and a corridor for leopard movement in otherwise transformed landscapes. Given the low level of risks to lives and livelihoods posed by leopards in this region, the continued persistence of leopards in this shared landscape is considered high. Education of landowners should still be prioritised to improve tolerance towards leopards in the event of occasional negative impacts (e.g., livestock depredation). |
|---|