Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Does the FICA [Financial Intelligence Centre Act] legislation compromise the unique relationship between attorney-client and is there a conflict?
Despite being relatively quite far down the long road to democracy, South Africa did not have any money-law laundering legislation. International pressure from organisations such as the Financial Action Task Force [FATF], the Organisation for Co-operation of Development [OECD] and Asia Pacific Group...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Public Law
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Does the FICA [Financial Intelligence Centre Act] legislation compromise the unique relationship between attorney-client and is there a conflict?
- Derivative Attorney-Client Privilege in Organizations
- Hiding Elephants in Mouseholes: Judicial (Mis)Application of the Federal Arbitration Act to Attorney-Client Arbitration Agreements
- Is the reporting obligation of attorneys in terms of section 29 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 a myth or a reality?
- The Suspicious Transaction Reporting Responsibilities of Attorneys in Terms of South African Anti-Money Laundering Legislative Frameworks
- Tax havens
- Closing the Courthouse Door on Private Attorneys General: Judicial Expansion of the First-to-file Bar in the False Claims Act is Inconsistent with the Act's Text and Purpose