Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences

As difficult as the task of reaching a reliable verdict may be, the second half of a criminal court's procedure, that of imposing sentences on those who have been found guilty or who have themselves admitted their guilt raises even more fundamental questions. What are we trying to do, what is the ob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oppert, Anna
Other Authors: van Zyl Smit, Dirk
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2023
Subjects:
law
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613669651644416
access_status_str Open Access
author Oppert, Anna
author2 van Zyl Smit, Dirk
author_browse Oppert, Anna
van Zyl Smit, Dirk
author_facet van Zyl Smit, Dirk
Oppert, Anna
author_sort Oppert, Anna
collection Thesis
description As difficult as the task of reaching a reliable verdict may be, the second half of a criminal court's procedure, that of imposing sentences on those who have been found guilty or who have themselves admitted their guilt raises even more fundamental questions. What are we trying to do, what is the object of this exercise? Traditionally there have been four approaches to the sentencing of an offender which correspond to the four "objects" or "purposes" of sentencing, namely retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence or incapacitation, i.e. the offender should be punished for the crime; the offender should be punished to be given the opportunity to return "onto the right track"; the offender (individual deterrence) or others (general deterrence) should be deterred from committing similar crimes in the future; and, finally, the offender should be incapacitated, i.e. be prevented from repeating crimes.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38741
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:39:49.716Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38741 About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences Oppert, Anna van Zyl Smit, Dirk law As difficult as the task of reaching a reliable verdict may be, the second half of a criminal court's procedure, that of imposing sentences on those who have been found guilty or who have themselves admitted their guilt raises even more fundamental questions. What are we trying to do, what is the object of this exercise? Traditionally there have been four approaches to the sentencing of an offender which correspond to the four "objects" or "purposes" of sentencing, namely retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence or incapacitation, i.e. the offender should be punished for the crime; the offender should be punished to be given the opportunity to return "onto the right track"; the offender (individual deterrence) or others (general deterrence) should be deterred from committing similar crimes in the future; and, finally, the offender should be incapacitated, i.e. be prevented from repeating crimes. 2023-09-18T13:44:58Z 2023-09-18T13:44:58Z 1995 2023-09-18T13:44:43Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38741 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law
spellingShingle law
Oppert, Anna
About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences
thesis_degree_str Master's
title About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences
title_full About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences
title_fullStr About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences
title_full_unstemmed About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences
title_short About the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences
title_sort about the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences
topic law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38741
work_keys_str_mv AT oppertanna abouttheconstitutionalityofmandatoryminimumsentences