Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most prevalent form of violence against women, both worldwide and in South Africa. Many studies have positioned South Africa as having one of the highest rates of both IPV prevalence and femicide. Correspondingly, intimate partners are responsible for most femi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Symonds, Jade
Other Authors: Chapman, Sarah
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Graduate School of Business (GSB) 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613183876792320
access_status_str Open Access
author Symonds, Jade
author2 Chapman, Sarah
author_browse Chapman, Sarah
Symonds, Jade
author_facet Chapman, Sarah
Symonds, Jade
author_sort Symonds, Jade
collection Thesis
description Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most prevalent form of violence against women, both worldwide and in South Africa. Many studies have positioned South Africa as having one of the highest rates of both IPV prevalence and femicide. Correspondingly, intimate partners are responsible for most femicides in South Africa. Despite being recognised globally as a criminal act, violence against women continues to threaten women's lives and violate their human rights. The South African Domestic Violence Act 1998 (DVA) protects against future acts of violence through the process of Protection Order (PO) application in Domestic Violence courts. Yet, The United Nations Women's Rights Committee (UN, 2021) found that frequent failures by the police to serve and enforce POs and low levels of prosecution and conviction in IPV cases in South Africa expose survivors to repeated abuses and results in the violation of South African women's fundamental rights. Although South African laws and policies on violence against women are considered comprehensive and comparative to international standards, increasingly high levels of IPV, reveal a wide rift between lived experiences of women in South Africa and the legislation in place. Despite this, there appear to be no recent studies that address barriers within programmatic implementation from the perspectives of IPV survivors. To add to this, it is widely acknowledged that IPV is multifaceted by nature and deeply entrenched in social norms. Thus, programmatic reponses must be pragmatic, dynamic and holistic to increase the chance of improvements at both individual and systemic levels. This dissertation, therefore, presents a process evaluation of the MOSAIC Access to Justice programme, a legal programme targeted at survivors of domestic violence. The focus is on the implementation of the legal processes in PO application for survivors of IPV and the key players and contextual factors applicable to this process. Accordingly, the focus is also placed on the possible barriers and facilitators to the PO process. MOSAIC is an NGO that operates across South Africa and seeks to provide holistic care to IPV survivors. The Access to Justice programme is one of several programmes implemented by MOSAIC. For the purposes of this dissertation, the evaluation will focus on the legal processes in the Wynberg and Khayelitsha courts. These are both located in low-income areas surrounding Cape Town
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/39874
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:06.010Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Graduate School of Business (GSB)
publisherStr Graduate School of Business (GSB)
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/39874 Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC Symonds, Jade Chapman, Sarah Programme Evaluation Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most prevalent form of violence against women, both worldwide and in South Africa. Many studies have positioned South Africa as having one of the highest rates of both IPV prevalence and femicide. Correspondingly, intimate partners are responsible for most femicides in South Africa. Despite being recognised globally as a criminal act, violence against women continues to threaten women's lives and violate their human rights. The South African Domestic Violence Act 1998 (DVA) protects against future acts of violence through the process of Protection Order (PO) application in Domestic Violence courts. Yet, The United Nations Women's Rights Committee (UN, 2021) found that frequent failures by the police to serve and enforce POs and low levels of prosecution and conviction in IPV cases in South Africa expose survivors to repeated abuses and results in the violation of South African women's fundamental rights. Although South African laws and policies on violence against women are considered comprehensive and comparative to international standards, increasingly high levels of IPV, reveal a wide rift between lived experiences of women in South Africa and the legislation in place. Despite this, there appear to be no recent studies that address barriers within programmatic implementation from the perspectives of IPV survivors. To add to this, it is widely acknowledged that IPV is multifaceted by nature and deeply entrenched in social norms. Thus, programmatic reponses must be pragmatic, dynamic and holistic to increase the chance of improvements at both individual and systemic levels. This dissertation, therefore, presents a process evaluation of the MOSAIC Access to Justice programme, a legal programme targeted at survivors of domestic violence. The focus is on the implementation of the legal processes in PO application for survivors of IPV and the key players and contextual factors applicable to this process. Accordingly, the focus is also placed on the possible barriers and facilitators to the PO process. MOSAIC is an NGO that operates across South Africa and seeks to provide holistic care to IPV survivors. The Access to Justice programme is one of several programmes implemented by MOSAIC. For the purposes of this dissertation, the evaluation will focus on the legal processes in the Wynberg and Khayelitsha courts. These are both located in low-income areas surrounding Cape Town 2024-06-05T13:28:40Z 2024-06-05T13:28:40Z 2023 2024-06-05T12:55:16Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters MPhil http://hdl.handle.net/11427/39874 eng application/pdf Graduate School of Business (GSB) Faculty of Commerce
spellingShingle Programme Evaluation
Symonds, Jade
Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC
title_full Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC
title_fullStr Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC
title_short Evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the Normalisation Process Theory: A Case study of MOSAIC
title_sort evaluating the legal protection system for survivors of intimate partner violence using the normalisation process theory a case study of mosaic
topic Programme Evaluation
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/39874
work_keys_str_mv AT symondsjade evaluatingthelegalprotectionsystemforsurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolenceusingthenormalisationprocesstheoryacasestudyofmosaic