Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations

In nature, many biota exhibit recognisable spatial groupings, commonly termed "clumps" or "patches" (Hutchinson 1953; Diggle 1983; Wilson 1978). Attempts to devise measures of such aggregation are usually based on statistically determining the frequency distributions of selected organism parameters...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miller, Denzil George Maxwell
Other Authors: Field, John G
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Biological Sciences 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613387610914816
access_status_str Open Access
author Miller, Denzil George Maxwell
author2 Field, John G
author_browse Field, John G
Miller, Denzil George Maxwell
author_facet Field, John G
Miller, Denzil George Maxwell
author_sort Miller, Denzil George Maxwell
collection Thesis
description In nature, many biota exhibit recognisable spatial groupings, commonly termed "clumps" or "patches" (Hutchinson 1953; Diggle 1983; Wilson 1978). Attempts to devise measures of such aggregation are usually based on statistically determining the frequency distributions of selected organism parameters (Morisita 1959; Pielou 1977; Okubo 1980). In their field study of the spatial distribution of some 102 species (ranging from protozoa to humans), Taylor et al. (1979) concluded that such data were on average significantly more clumped than random. Since theoretically derived contagious distributions are often fitted to observed frequency distributions of this kind (Bliss 1971), the underlying spatial patterns are therefore usually concluded to be "patchy" (i.e. the organism is unevenly distributed in space). This, however, does not allow for concrete conclusions to be drawn about the underlying mechanism(s) inducing the observed distribution(s) and provides little more than sample statistics for, or at best a static picture of, the spatial pattern of the organism(s) concerned (Okubo 1980). Fmihermore, unless patches are essentially discrete their resulting distributions are often difficult to discern objectively (Skellam 1952; Waters and Henson 1959).
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40566
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:35:20.741Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Department of Biological Sciences
publisherStr Department of Biological Sciences
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40566 The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations Miller, Denzil George Maxwell Field, John G Zoology In nature, many biota exhibit recognisable spatial groupings, commonly termed "clumps" or "patches" (Hutchinson 1953; Diggle 1983; Wilson 1978). Attempts to devise measures of such aggregation are usually based on statistically determining the frequency distributions of selected organism parameters (Morisita 1959; Pielou 1977; Okubo 1980). In their field study of the spatial distribution of some 102 species (ranging from protozoa to humans), Taylor et al. (1979) concluded that such data were on average significantly more clumped than random. Since theoretically derived contagious distributions are often fitted to observed frequency distributions of this kind (Bliss 1971), the underlying spatial patterns are therefore usually concluded to be "patchy" (i.e. the organism is unevenly distributed in space). This, however, does not allow for concrete conclusions to be drawn about the underlying mechanism(s) inducing the observed distribution(s) and provides little more than sample statistics for, or at best a static picture of, the spatial pattern of the organism(s) concerned (Okubo 1980). Fmihermore, unless patches are essentially discrete their resulting distributions are often difficult to discern objectively (Skellam 1952; Waters and Henson 1959). 2024-10-10T10:45:52Z 2024-10-10T10:45:52Z 1994 2024-07-12T07:22:46Z Thesis / Dissertation Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40566 eng application/pdf Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science
spellingShingle Zoology
Miller, Denzil George Maxwell
The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations
title_full The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations
title_fullStr The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations
title_full_unstemmed The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations
title_short The spatial distribution of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) aggregations
title_sort spatial distribution of antarctic krill euphausia superba dana aggregations
topic Zoology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40566
work_keys_str_mv AT millerdenzilgeorgemaxwell thespatialdistributionofantarctickrilleuphausiasuperbadanaaggregations
AT millerdenzilgeorgemaxwell spatialdistributionofantarctickrilleuphausiasuperbadanaaggregations