Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement
On May 9, 1950 Robert Schuman, the French Foreign Minister, announced his proposal to place the whole French and German steel production under a common High Authority which allowed other European countries the opportunity to participate. In his proposal he took care to provide for the establishment...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute of Marine and Environmental Law
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613317835522048 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Blum, Jan Burkhard |
| author2 | Devine, D J |
| author_browse | Blum, Jan Burkhard Devine, D J |
| author_facet | Devine, D J Blum, Jan Burkhard |
| author_sort | Blum, Jan Burkhard |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | On May 9, 1950 Robert Schuman, the French Foreign Minister, announced his proposal to place the whole French and German steel production under a common High Authority which allowed other European countries the opportunity to participate. In his proposal he took care to provide for the establishment of a court of justice subjecting the new authority to judicial control. One year later, in April, 1951 the European Coal and Steel Treaty (ECSC) was signed in Paris creating the Court of Justice, which was intended to ensure that the new community was governed by democratic principles and the rule of law. Following this, the ratification debates took place in the parliaments of the six countries. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40719 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:34:14.045Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Institute of Marine and Environmental Law |
| publisherStr | Institute of Marine and Environmental Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40719 A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement Blum, Jan Burkhard Devine, D J Law On May 9, 1950 Robert Schuman, the French Foreign Minister, announced his proposal to place the whole French and German steel production under a common High Authority which allowed other European countries the opportunity to participate. In his proposal he took care to provide for the establishment of a court of justice subjecting the new authority to judicial control. One year later, in April, 1951 the European Coal and Steel Treaty (ECSC) was signed in Paris creating the Court of Justice, which was intended to ensure that the new community was governed by democratic principles and the rule of law. Following this, the ratification debates took place in the parliaments of the six countries. 2024-11-20T10:45:00Z 2024-11-20T10:45:00Z 1997 2024-07-11T12:06:51Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 eng application/pdf Institute of Marine and Environmental Law Faculty of Law |
| spellingShingle | Law Blum, Jan Burkhard A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement |
| title_full | A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement |
| title_fullStr | A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement |
| title_short | A comparison between the European Court of Justice, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea Convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement |
| title_sort | comparison between the european court of justice the international court of justice and the international tribunal of the law of the sea convention with special emphasis on jurisdiction and enforcement |
| topic | Law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40719 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT blumjanburkhard acomparisonbetweentheeuropeancourtofjusticetheinternationalcourtofjusticeandtheinternationaltribunalofthelawoftheseaconventionwithspecialemphasisonjurisdictionandenforcement AT blumjanburkhard comparisonbetweentheeuropeancourtofjusticetheinternationalcourtofjusticeandtheinternationaltribunalofthelawoftheseaconventionwithspecialemphasisonjurisdictionandenforcement |