Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law

There are many different reasons why people want to. acquire companies. Although takeovers are an extremely dangerous and high risk game, they are becoming more and more numerous in the modern business world. An acquiror, however, tries to minimize his risk by trying to take over a company with a sc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kralik, Florian
Other Authors: Blackman, M
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Centre for Law and Society 2024
Subjects:
Law
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614133858336768
access_status_str Open Access
author Kralik, Florian
author2 Blackman, M
author_browse Blackman, M
Kralik, Florian
author_facet Blackman, M
Kralik, Florian
author_sort Kralik, Florian
collection Thesis
description There are many different reasons why people want to. acquire companies. Although takeovers are an extremely dangerous and high risk game, they are becoming more and more numerous in the modern business world. An acquiror, however, tries to minimize his risk by trying to take over a company with a scheme of arrangement applying section 311 of the South African Companies Act, which gives him the necessary· tool to takeover a 'clean' company without unknown creditors. That means that such a scheme must be a compromise or arrangement 'between the company and its creditors' before it can be sanctioned by court and therefore becomes binding on all the creditors, whether they are known or unknown. At least 3/4 of the creditors votes and numbers must support the arrangement. To draft a scheme for this reason alone, however, would not be a big problem. What makes these takeovers so sophisticated is that every acquiror also wants to profit from the assessed loss of the target company, which is often available. Therefore to draft a scheme, which, on the one hand complies with section 311 of the Companies Act, and on the other hand, does not comply with section 20 (1) (a) (ii) of the Income Tax Act in order to profit from the assessed loss, makes the scheme industry difficult.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40721
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:47:12.418Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Centre for Law and Society
publisherStr Centre for Law and Society
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40721 Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law Kralik, Florian Blackman, M Law There are many different reasons why people want to. acquire companies. Although takeovers are an extremely dangerous and high risk game, they are becoming more and more numerous in the modern business world. An acquiror, however, tries to minimize his risk by trying to take over a company with a scheme of arrangement applying section 311 of the South African Companies Act, which gives him the necessary· tool to takeover a 'clean' company without unknown creditors. That means that such a scheme must be a compromise or arrangement 'between the company and its creditors' before it can be sanctioned by court and therefore becomes binding on all the creditors, whether they are known or unknown. At least 3/4 of the creditors votes and numbers must support the arrangement. To draft a scheme for this reason alone, however, would not be a big problem. What makes these takeovers so sophisticated is that every acquiror also wants to profit from the assessed loss of the target company, which is often available. Therefore to draft a scheme, which, on the one hand complies with section 311 of the Companies Act, and on the other hand, does not comply with section 20 (1) (a) (ii) of the Income Tax Act in order to profit from the assessed loss, makes the scheme industry difficult. 2024-11-20T13:20:36Z 2024-11-20T13:20:36Z 1997 2024-07-11T09:19:45Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40721 eng application/pdf Centre for Law and Society Faculty of Law
spellingShingle Law
Kralik, Florian
Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law
title_full Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law
title_fullStr Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law
title_full_unstemmed Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law
title_short Offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in South African Company Law
title_sort offers of compromises and schemes of arrangements in south african company law
topic Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40721
work_keys_str_mv AT kralikflorian offersofcompromisesandschemesofarrangementsinsouthafricancompanylaw