Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases
The Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997 introduced prescribed minimum sentences for certain offences. Rape is included in this list of offences. The purpose of the enactment of the legislation was the enforcement of a severe and uniform sentencing response to the crimes listed in a Schedule to th...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Department of Public Law
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613142533537792 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Gihwala, Harsha Zoë |
| author2 | Moult, Kelley |
| author_browse | Gihwala, Harsha Zoë Moult, Kelley |
| author_facet | Moult, Kelley Gihwala, Harsha Zoë |
| author_sort | Gihwala, Harsha Zoë |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997 introduced prescribed minimum sentences for certain offences. Rape is included in this list of offences. The purpose of the enactment of the legislation was the enforcement of a severe and uniform sentencing response to the crimes listed in a Schedule to the legislation. This was seen as particularly necessary for cases of rape. At the time, rape statistics had become untenably high, and both government and our courts were seen as not being harsh or consistent enough with their response to this serious, violent, and rampant crime. Despite the aims of the legislation however, the response to it, both in the literature and from the judiciary, was overwhelmingly negative. While the legislation provides for instances where the prescribed minimum need not be imposed due to ‘substantial and compelling circumstances', it has not provided much guidance on what this term should mean in practice. As such, the implementation of the Act has seen judicial officers interpreting this phrase so as to allow them to continue to rely on many of the factors that were taken into account before the enactment of the legislation. One of these factors, physical injury, it is argued, relies on myths and stereotypes about rape and the expected nature of it, including the severity of the injuries a complainant should sustain from the commission of such a crime. In 2007 the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Amendment Act 38 of 2007 attempted to limit the use of physical injury suffered by the complainant as a substantial and compelling circumstance. This dissertation analyses judgments both pre- and post the amendment in order to ascertain whether there has been a change in the way in which physical injury is considered in rape sentencing judgments. It will point to the language being used in judgments when courts do consider physical injury as a substantial and compelling circumstance when departing from the prescribed minimum sentences, and will discuss whether this is in line with the purpose of the legislative framework that has been created for the adjudication of sexual offences cases. Lastly, it will present a number of recommendations that seek to argue for further clarity to be provided with respect to factors that should or should not be considered during sentencing, in order to seek to improve the experiences of complainants during the sentencing process. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40945 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | English eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:31:26.417Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Department of Public Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Public Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40945 Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases Gihwala, Harsha Zoë Moult, Kelley criminal law The Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997 introduced prescribed minimum sentences for certain offences. Rape is included in this list of offences. The purpose of the enactment of the legislation was the enforcement of a severe and uniform sentencing response to the crimes listed in a Schedule to the legislation. This was seen as particularly necessary for cases of rape. At the time, rape statistics had become untenably high, and both government and our courts were seen as not being harsh or consistent enough with their response to this serious, violent, and rampant crime. Despite the aims of the legislation however, the response to it, both in the literature and from the judiciary, was overwhelmingly negative. While the legislation provides for instances where the prescribed minimum need not be imposed due to ‘substantial and compelling circumstances', it has not provided much guidance on what this term should mean in practice. As such, the implementation of the Act has seen judicial officers interpreting this phrase so as to allow them to continue to rely on many of the factors that were taken into account before the enactment of the legislation. One of these factors, physical injury, it is argued, relies on myths and stereotypes about rape and the expected nature of it, including the severity of the injuries a complainant should sustain from the commission of such a crime. In 2007 the Criminal Law (Sentencing) Amendment Act 38 of 2007 attempted to limit the use of physical injury suffered by the complainant as a substantial and compelling circumstance. This dissertation analyses judgments both pre- and post the amendment in order to ascertain whether there has been a change in the way in which physical injury is considered in rape sentencing judgments. It will point to the language being used in judgments when courts do consider physical injury as a substantial and compelling circumstance when departing from the prescribed minimum sentences, and will discuss whether this is in line with the purpose of the legislative framework that has been created for the adjudication of sexual offences cases. Lastly, it will present a number of recommendations that seek to argue for further clarity to be provided with respect to factors that should or should not be considered during sentencing, in order to seek to improve the experiences of complainants during the sentencing process. 2025-02-13T10:44:11Z 2025-02-13T10:44:11Z 2024 2025-02-13T10:41:25Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40945 en eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | criminal law Gihwala, Harsha Zoë Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases |
| title_full | Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases |
| title_fullStr | Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases |
| title_full_unstemmed | Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases |
| title_short | Examining the Impact of Serious Physical Injury on Sentencing in South African Rape Cases |
| title_sort | examining the impact of serious physical injury on sentencing in south african rape cases |
| topic | criminal law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40945 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gihwalaharshazoe examiningtheimpactofseriousphysicalinjuryonsentencinginsouthafricanrapecases |