Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials

The impact of criminal courts accepting an honest eyewitness misidentification extends beyond the theoretical considerations of the purpose of criminal trials, sentencing, and mere notions of justice. A wrongful conviction has the consequence of punishing an innocent person, while allowing a guilty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Musabayana, Anesu Michelle Catherine
Other Authors: Moult, Kelley
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613209304760320
access_status_str Open Access
author Musabayana, Anesu Michelle Catherine
author2 Moult, Kelley
author_browse Moult, Kelley
Musabayana, Anesu Michelle Catherine
author_facet Moult, Kelley
Musabayana, Anesu Michelle Catherine
author_sort Musabayana, Anesu Michelle Catherine
collection Thesis
description The impact of criminal courts accepting an honest eyewitness misidentification extends beyond the theoretical considerations of the purpose of criminal trials, sentencing, and mere notions of justice. A wrongful conviction has the consequence of punishing an innocent person, while allowing a guilty person to walk free. Such a conviction negatively impacts the life of the accused, who may suffer while in prison, and experience complex and long-lasting mental and social problems as a result of their conviction. It also damages the reliability and relevance of the criminal justice system, which should be underpinned by principles of fairness and justice. Consequently, it should be of significant concern that research across decades has confirmed the inherent fallibility of human memory. But has this research filtered into the court room? To answer this question, I have conducted a content analysis of thirteen murder cases heard by the Western Cape High Court between 2007 and 2021 to consider how the Court considers the role of human memory in eyewitness testimony. Using thematic analysis, I show how the Court has appeared to weigh various factors that support and detract from a witness' reliability, how it determines the risk level presented by each factor, and how it assures itself of its finding. From this, my findings confirm both a general judicial awareness of the risk involved in accepting eyewitness identification evidence, as well as an inherent subjectivity in how the Court comes to its conclusion that is not supported by scientific evidence. As such, I recommend the development of a more precise test for reliability, as well as further study into the area.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41141
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:29.432Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41141 Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials Musabayana, Anesu Michelle Catherine Moult, Kelley Moult, Kelley public law The impact of criminal courts accepting an honest eyewitness misidentification extends beyond the theoretical considerations of the purpose of criminal trials, sentencing, and mere notions of justice. A wrongful conviction has the consequence of punishing an innocent person, while allowing a guilty person to walk free. Such a conviction negatively impacts the life of the accused, who may suffer while in prison, and experience complex and long-lasting mental and social problems as a result of their conviction. It also damages the reliability and relevance of the criminal justice system, which should be underpinned by principles of fairness and justice. Consequently, it should be of significant concern that research across decades has confirmed the inherent fallibility of human memory. But has this research filtered into the court room? To answer this question, I have conducted a content analysis of thirteen murder cases heard by the Western Cape High Court between 2007 and 2021 to consider how the Court considers the role of human memory in eyewitness testimony. Using thematic analysis, I show how the Court has appeared to weigh various factors that support and detract from a witness' reliability, how it determines the risk level presented by each factor, and how it assures itself of its finding. From this, my findings confirm both a general judicial awareness of the risk involved in accepting eyewitness identification evidence, as well as an inherent subjectivity in how the Court comes to its conclusion that is not supported by scientific evidence. As such, I recommend the development of a more precise test for reliability, as well as further study into the area. 2025-03-11T11:40:23Z 2025-03-11T11:40:23Z 2024 2025-03-11T11:19:21Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41141 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle public law
Musabayana, Anesu Michelle Catherine
Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials
title_full Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials
title_fullStr Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials
title_full_unstemmed Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials
title_short Beyond a reasonable doubt: how South African courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials
title_sort beyond a reasonable doubt how south african courts assess eyewitness testimony in murder trials
topic public law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41141
work_keys_str_mv AT musabayanaanesumichellecatherine beyondareasonabledoubthowsouthafricancourtsassesseyewitnesstestimonyinmurdertrials