Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights

Upon the inauguration of the Constitution of Kenya in 2010, women's reproductive health rights seemed poised to witness progressive guarantees that would be in line with international human rights standards – this has not been the case. On the one hand, the Penal Code of Kenya effectively criminaliz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Onyango, Kevin Robert
Other Authors: Ramalekana, Nomfundo
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Department of Public Law 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613169608818688
access_status_str Open Access
author Onyango, Kevin Robert
author2 Ramalekana, Nomfundo
author_browse Onyango, Kevin Robert
Ramalekana, Nomfundo
author_facet Ramalekana, Nomfundo
Onyango, Kevin Robert
author_sort Onyango, Kevin Robert
collection Thesis
description Upon the inauguration of the Constitution of Kenya in 2010, women's reproductive health rights seemed poised to witness progressive guarantees that would be in line with international human rights standards – this has not been the case. On the one hand, the Penal Code of Kenya effectively criminalizes abortion. Conversely, Article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 provides an exception to the general rule criminalizing abortion. Article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya provides that abortion is permissible only if a quali ied health professional deems an emergency treatment necessary, or when there is a discernible threat to the life of the mother, or if sanctioned by any other written law. Unfortunately, sections 158, 159 and 160 of the Kenyan Penal Code, which proscribe abortion, have not been amended to be in line with the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. The discordant legal framework has induced ambiguity and confusion regarding abortion law in Kenya. This thesis critically explores the evolution of abortion law in Kenya and analyses how the Courts have, in light of the ambiguity in the legal framework, adjudicated abortion cases. It examines what, if at all, are the human rights implications of criminalizing abortion. Relying on comparative research methodology, the thesis examines the abortion laws in South Africa and Ireland to provide insights on how Kenya can develop its abortion laws to better protect the rights of women and girls and adhere to its human rights obligations. Ultimately, the thesis argues that the inherent ambiguity within Kenya's abortion laws perpetuates the violation of women's and girls' rights and thus ought to be amended.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41216
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:52.071Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41216 Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights Onyango, Kevin Robert Ramalekana, Nomfundo public law Upon the inauguration of the Constitution of Kenya in 2010, women's reproductive health rights seemed poised to witness progressive guarantees that would be in line with international human rights standards – this has not been the case. On the one hand, the Penal Code of Kenya effectively criminalizes abortion. Conversely, Article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 provides an exception to the general rule criminalizing abortion. Article 26(4) of the Constitution of Kenya provides that abortion is permissible only if a quali ied health professional deems an emergency treatment necessary, or when there is a discernible threat to the life of the mother, or if sanctioned by any other written law. Unfortunately, sections 158, 159 and 160 of the Kenyan Penal Code, which proscribe abortion, have not been amended to be in line with the Constitution of Kenya, 2010. The discordant legal framework has induced ambiguity and confusion regarding abortion law in Kenya. This thesis critically explores the evolution of abortion law in Kenya and analyses how the Courts have, in light of the ambiguity in the legal framework, adjudicated abortion cases. It examines what, if at all, are the human rights implications of criminalizing abortion. Relying on comparative research methodology, the thesis examines the abortion laws in South Africa and Ireland to provide insights on how Kenya can develop its abortion laws to better protect the rights of women and girls and adhere to its human rights obligations. Ultimately, the thesis argues that the inherent ambiguity within Kenya's abortion laws perpetuates the violation of women's and girls' rights and thus ought to be amended. 2025-03-20T07:07:36Z 2025-03-20T07:07:36Z 2024 2025-03-20T06:58:47Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41216 en eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law
spellingShingle public law
Onyango, Kevin Robert
Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights
title_full Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights
title_fullStr Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights
title_short Constitutional but criminal: an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in Kenya through the prism of international human rights
title_sort constitutional but criminal an analysis of the ambiguous abortion law in kenya through the prism of international human rights
topic public law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41216
work_keys_str_mv AT onyangokevinrobert constitutionalbutcriminalananalysisoftheambiguousabortionlawinkenyathroughtheprismofinternationalhumanrights