Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law
The Constitutional Court's judgment in Beadica 231 CC v Trustees for the time being of the Oregon Trust (‘Beadica') sought to settle a long-standing debate in South African contract law concerning the proper scope of the public policy doctrine. This thesis traces the historical development of the do...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Department of Public Law
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613165707067392 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Taylor, Max |
| author2 | Price, Alistair |
| author_browse | Price, Alistair Taylor, Max |
| author_facet | Price, Alistair Taylor, Max |
| author_sort | Taylor, Max |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The Constitutional Court's judgment in Beadica 231 CC v Trustees for the time being of the Oregon Trust (‘Beadica') sought to settle a long-standing debate in South African contract law concerning the proper scope of the public policy doctrine. This thesis traces the historical development of the doctrine and then critically evaluates the Beadica decision, firstly by clarifying what it held and, secondly by identifying certain doctrinal questions that remain unresolved post-Beadica, particularly questions relating to the application of the test developed by the Constitutional Court in Barkhuizen v Napier. The thesis contends that Beadica held that the public policy doctrine does not permit courts to override contracts on the stand-alone basis that they are unreasonable or contrary to some other abstract value. It did not, however, take the more far-reaching view, ascribed to it by the dissenting judgment, that abstract values can never be directly applied as override grounds under the public policy doctrine. Instead, it held that abstract values can be directly applied, contingent on certain conditions being met. Drawing on various historical and conceptual arguments developed during the thesis, possible avenues for the further rationalisation and constitutionalisation of the public policy doctrine are proposed and assessed. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41340 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | English eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:31:48.735Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | Department of Public Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Public Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41340 The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law Taylor, Max Price, Alistair Naud, Tjakie private law The Constitutional Court's judgment in Beadica 231 CC v Trustees for the time being of the Oregon Trust (‘Beadica') sought to settle a long-standing debate in South African contract law concerning the proper scope of the public policy doctrine. This thesis traces the historical development of the doctrine and then critically evaluates the Beadica decision, firstly by clarifying what it held and, secondly by identifying certain doctrinal questions that remain unresolved post-Beadica, particularly questions relating to the application of the test developed by the Constitutional Court in Barkhuizen v Napier. The thesis contends that Beadica held that the public policy doctrine does not permit courts to override contracts on the stand-alone basis that they are unreasonable or contrary to some other abstract value. It did not, however, take the more far-reaching view, ascribed to it by the dissenting judgment, that abstract values can never be directly applied as override grounds under the public policy doctrine. Instead, it held that abstract values can be directly applied, contingent on certain conditions being met. Drawing on various historical and conceptual arguments developed during the thesis, possible avenues for the further rationalisation and constitutionalisation of the public policy doctrine are proposed and assessed. 2025-04-03T10:34:30Z 2025-04-03T10:34:30Z 2024 2025-04-03T10:30:23Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41340 en eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | private law Taylor, Max The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law |
| title_full | The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law |
| title_fullStr | The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law |
| title_full_unstemmed | The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law |
| title_short | The impact of Beadica on the public policy doctrine in South African contract law |
| title_sort | impact of beadica on the public policy doctrine in south african contract law |
| topic | private law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41340 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taylormax theimpactofbeadicaonthepublicpolicydoctrineinsouthafricancontractlaw AT taylormax impactofbeadicaonthepublicpolicydoctrineinsouthafricancontractlaw |