Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended

[pg 2 missing] On 1 November 1983 Parliament promulgated The Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, Act 105 of 1983 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), which repealed the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 of the United Kingdom insofar as it applied in relation to the Republic of South Africa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin
Other Authors: Zuidgeest, Marcus
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Department of Commercial Law 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613302143582208
access_status_str Open Access
author Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin
author2 Zuidgeest, Marcus
author_browse Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin
Zuidgeest, Marcus
author_facet Zuidgeest, Marcus
Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin
author_sort Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin
collection Thesis
description [pg 2 missing] On 1 November 1983 Parliament promulgated The Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, Act 105 of 1983 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), which repealed the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 of the United Kingdom insofar as it applied in relation to the Republic of South Africa. The Act revolutionised the law applicable to admiralty proceedings in the Republic of South Africa and answered the need for a codified and modern approach toward admiralty law as applied in South Africa, which had been advocated by maritime concerns and jurists for many years. The Act has been described as one which contained "novel, unusual and at times far-reaching provisions” and that in being enacted it was the intention of the Legislature: "to introduce a remedial measure designed to provide what is nowadays referred to as 'a new dispensation' in respect of maritime claims and their enforcement in South Africa". Many statutory rights and remedies not previously part of the English admiralty law as applied in the Supreme Courts of the Republic of South Africa were introduced by the Act. With the extension in the category of "maritime claims" now available to the claimant came a statutory extension of the Court's powers to adjudicate on matters maritime in -terms of the Act brought by "the wandering litigants" of the maritime community.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41457
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:59.204Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Department of Commercial Law
publisherStr Department of Commercial Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41457 The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin Zuidgeest, Marcus Commercial Law [pg 2 missing] On 1 November 1983 Parliament promulgated The Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, Act 105 of 1983 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), which repealed the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 of the United Kingdom insofar as it applied in relation to the Republic of South Africa. The Act revolutionised the law applicable to admiralty proceedings in the Republic of South Africa and answered the need for a codified and modern approach toward admiralty law as applied in South Africa, which had been advocated by maritime concerns and jurists for many years. The Act has been described as one which contained "novel, unusual and at times far-reaching provisions” and that in being enacted it was the intention of the Legislature: "to introduce a remedial measure designed to provide what is nowadays referred to as 'a new dispensation' in respect of maritime claims and their enforcement in South Africa". Many statutory rights and remedies not previously part of the English admiralty law as applied in the Supreme Courts of the Republic of South Africa were introduced by the Act. With the extension in the category of "maritime claims" now available to the claimant came a statutory extension of the Court's powers to adjudicate on matters maritime in -terms of the Act brought by "the wandering litigants" of the maritime community. 2025-06-19T14:08:52Z 2025-06-19T14:08:52Z 1998 2024-07-11T08:30:33Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457 en eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Commercial Law
Malan, Christopher Cyril Martin
The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended
title_full The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended
title_fullStr The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended
title_full_unstemmed The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended
title_short The doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the South African Admiralty Court in terms of section 7(1) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act, 105 of 1983, as amended
title_sort doctrine of forum non conveniens and the discretionary limitation of jurisdiction of the south african admiralty court in terms of section 7 1 of the admiralty jurisdiction regulation act 105 of 1983 as amended
topic Commercial Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41457
work_keys_str_mv AT malanchristophercyrilmartin thedoctrineofforumnonconveniensandthediscretionarylimitationofjurisdictionofthesouthafricanadmiraltycourtintermsofsection71oftheadmiraltyjurisdictionregulationact105of1983asamended
AT malanchristophercyrilmartin doctrineofforumnonconveniensandthediscretionarylimitationofjurisdictionofthesouthafricanadmiraltycourtintermsofsection71oftheadmiraltyjurisdictionregulationact105of1983asamended