Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Fire the hired gun: Eliminating expert bias in the accusatorial-adversarial civil justice system
In 1954, an expert witness, Dr Unsworth, testifying for the defendant, exculpatorily opined that the plaintiff was a malingerer, but had he testified for the plaintiff instead, his opinion would be that the plaintiff's condition was post-traumatic at the hands of the defendant. 1 This statement capt...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Public Law
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In 1954, an expert witness, Dr Unsworth, testifying for the defendant, exculpatorily opined that the plaintiff was a malingerer, but had he testified for the plaintiff instead, his opinion would be that the plaintiff's condition was post-traumatic at the hands of the defendant. 1 This statement captures the essence of the adversarial expert bias problem. As early as 1843, selection expert bias (adversarial bias) was observed in AngloAmerican jurisdictions. 2 From a cursory search of South African case law, more fully set out in section 4.8, it is evident that expert bias is a legitimate and significant problem. 3 This work considers the problematic manifestation of expert bias in South Africa and possible responses thereto in the context of a predominantly adversarial procedural system, but the problem is in no way confined to the adversarial legal systems |
|---|