Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite

The demand for rare earth elements (REEs) is continuously increasing since all high-tech products contain them. The Steenkampskraal (SKK) mine holds the full spectrum of REEs including high-value neodymium (Nd) used in the manufacture of high strength magnets, computers and hard drives. The REEs and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmed, Uwais
Other Authors: Petersen, Joachim
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Department of Chemical Engineering 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867611270197280768
access_status_str Open Access
author Ahmed, Uwais
author2 Petersen, Joachim
author_browse Ahmed, Uwais
Petersen, Joachim
author_facet Petersen, Joachim
Ahmed, Uwais
author_sort Ahmed, Uwais
collection Thesis
description The demand for rare earth elements (REEs) is continuously increasing since all high-tech products contain them. The Steenkampskraal (SKK) mine holds the full spectrum of REEs including high-value neodymium (Nd) used in the manufacture of high strength magnets, computers and hard drives. The REEs and thorium (Th) deposit at the SKK mine in the Western Cape has been confirmed to be the highest grade in the world, at an average of 14.4% Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO) and 2.14% ThO2 respectively, with some locations of the ore body having as high as 45% TREO. These rare earths are hosted in the dominant mineral called monazite. In order to free the REEs from the monazite crystal, it requires “cracking” from the lattice such that it may be soluble in aqueous solution from which it undergoes purification. Two methods of cracking are usually employed in processing of monazite concentrate: caustic and sulphuric acid cracking. The aim of this study was to decide which route was more suitable to the SKK monazite in terms of factors which are usually considered in the setting up of such a processing plant, such as: recovery, capital expenditure (CAPEX); operating expenditure (OPEX); Safety, Health, Radiation, Environment and Quality (SHREQ); and lastly the effects on downstream processes. Experiments were firstly done to develop a flow sheet based on the optimum conditions at which each of these processes were to be carried out. These results would firstly indicate the recovery obtained from each of the processes and additionally impact on our choice of equipment (hence CAPEX), the amount of reagents and power (thus OPEX) and other factors such as SHREQ and effects on downstream processes. It was found that the TREO recovery from the caustic crack was 89% and that of the sulphuric acid crack 90%. However, the sulphuric acid crack required more process stages since the test results implied that the feed to the crack required drying and the product from the crack required conversion from a sulphate into a hydroxide salt. This resulted in a CAPEX of R 13,54M as opposed to the lower value of R 10,03M in the caustic circuit. Also, based on approximately 3 tons of feed to the hydrometallurgical circuit it was found that the sulphuric acid crack required almost twice the amount of OPEX since the power requirement was double that of the caustic cracking method and the reagent requirements were approximately 22% greater. Both of the CAPEX and OPEX mentioned, indicate that the project NPV for the caustic cracking route is ~12.5% higher (~R200M) when treating SKK monazite. The effect on downstream processes was also more negative in the sulphuric acid crack since there was a 5% loss during the double salt precipitation (DSP), 70% of which was Y. Were Y to be recovered at a later stage, its recovery, necessitating further process steps, would have further implications in the plant's CAPEX and OPEX. In addition to this, Th splits at an almost 1:1 ratio after the DSP step and would require an introduction of two new processing legs. The SHREQ aspects that were considered identified minimal impact in the caustic crack route. These, however, were quite extreme in the acid crack route, due to the latter containing high volumes of chemically altered effluents as well as the handling of fine dust particles resulting from its numerous drying stages. In addition to this, the main motivation to favour the caustic cracking route was to avoid the SO3 gas emissions that occurred when using the sulphuric acid cracking route. Hence, it was concluded that the caustic cracking was superior to the sulphuric acid cracking route when treating SKK monazite.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41558
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Department of Chemical Engineering
publisherStr Department of Chemical Engineering
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41558 A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite Ahmed, Uwais Petersen, Joachim Zimba, Witker Steenkampskraal Monazite Rare Earth Elements Caustic Crack Sulphuric Acid Crack The demand for rare earth elements (REEs) is continuously increasing since all high-tech products contain them. The Steenkampskraal (SKK) mine holds the full spectrum of REEs including high-value neodymium (Nd) used in the manufacture of high strength magnets, computers and hard drives. The REEs and thorium (Th) deposit at the SKK mine in the Western Cape has been confirmed to be the highest grade in the world, at an average of 14.4% Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO) and 2.14% ThO2 respectively, with some locations of the ore body having as high as 45% TREO. These rare earths are hosted in the dominant mineral called monazite. In order to free the REEs from the monazite crystal, it requires “cracking” from the lattice such that it may be soluble in aqueous solution from which it undergoes purification. Two methods of cracking are usually employed in processing of monazite concentrate: caustic and sulphuric acid cracking. The aim of this study was to decide which route was more suitable to the SKK monazite in terms of factors which are usually considered in the setting up of such a processing plant, such as: recovery, capital expenditure (CAPEX); operating expenditure (OPEX); Safety, Health, Radiation, Environment and Quality (SHREQ); and lastly the effects on downstream processes. Experiments were firstly done to develop a flow sheet based on the optimum conditions at which each of these processes were to be carried out. These results would firstly indicate the recovery obtained from each of the processes and additionally impact on our choice of equipment (hence CAPEX), the amount of reagents and power (thus OPEX) and other factors such as SHREQ and effects on downstream processes. It was found that the TREO recovery from the caustic crack was 89% and that of the sulphuric acid crack 90%. However, the sulphuric acid crack required more process stages since the test results implied that the feed to the crack required drying and the product from the crack required conversion from a sulphate into a hydroxide salt. This resulted in a CAPEX of R 13,54M as opposed to the lower value of R 10,03M in the caustic circuit. Also, based on approximately 3 tons of feed to the hydrometallurgical circuit it was found that the sulphuric acid crack required almost twice the amount of OPEX since the power requirement was double that of the caustic cracking method and the reagent requirements were approximately 22% greater. Both of the CAPEX and OPEX mentioned, indicate that the project NPV for the caustic cracking route is ~12.5% higher (~R200M) when treating SKK monazite. The effect on downstream processes was also more negative in the sulphuric acid crack since there was a 5% loss during the double salt precipitation (DSP), 70% of which was Y. Were Y to be recovered at a later stage, its recovery, necessitating further process steps, would have further implications in the plant's CAPEX and OPEX. In addition to this, Th splits at an almost 1:1 ratio after the DSP step and would require an introduction of two new processing legs. The SHREQ aspects that were considered identified minimal impact in the caustic crack route. These, however, were quite extreme in the acid crack route, due to the latter containing high volumes of chemically altered effluents as well as the handling of fine dust particles resulting from its numerous drying stages. In addition to this, the main motivation to favour the caustic cracking route was to avoid the SO3 gas emissions that occurred when using the sulphuric acid cracking route. Hence, it was concluded that the caustic cracking was superior to the sulphuric acid cracking route when treating SKK monazite. 2025-08-07T07:37:08Z 2025-08-07T07:37:08Z 2017 2025-08-06T11:17:24Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41558 en eng application/pdf Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Steenkampskraal
Monazite
Rare Earth Elements
Caustic Crack
Sulphuric Acid Crack
Ahmed, Uwais
A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite
title_full A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite
title_fullStr A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite
title_full_unstemmed A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite
title_short A hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal (skk) monazite
title_sort hydrometallurgical comparison between the caustic and sulphuric acid cracking of steenkampskraal skk monazite
topic Steenkampskraal
Monazite
Rare Earth Elements
Caustic Crack
Sulphuric Acid Crack
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41558
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmeduwais ahydrometallurgicalcomparisonbetweenthecausticandsulphuricacidcrackingofsteenkampskraalskkmonazite
AT ahmeduwais hydrometallurgicalcomparisonbetweenthecausticandsulphuricacidcrackingofsteenkampskraalskkmonazite