Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre

Background: Rectal injuries are associated with significant morbidity. Primary repair of extraperitoneal rectal injuries, presacral drainage (PSD) and distal rectal washout (DRW) have become historical adjuncts. Aim: A retrospective review was performed to determine the outcome of rectal injuries in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Govender, Terron
Other Authors: Navsaria, Pradeep
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Division of General Surgery 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613276672622592
access_status_str Open Access
author Govender, Terron
author2 Navsaria, Pradeep
author_browse Govender, Terron
Navsaria, Pradeep
author_facet Navsaria, Pradeep
Govender, Terron
author_sort Govender, Terron
collection Thesis
description Background: Rectal injuries are associated with significant morbidity. Primary repair of extraperitoneal rectal injuries, presacral drainage (PSD) and distal rectal washout (DRW) have become historical adjuncts. Aim: A retrospective review was performed to determine the outcome of rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre with a high incidence of penetrating trauma where a simple surgical management approach to these injuries is practiced. Methods: The records of all patients with a full-thickness penetrating rectal injury admitted to the Trauma Centre at Groote Schuur Hospital over a 10-year period (January 2010 – December 2019) were reviewed. Basic demographics, injury mechanism and perioperative management, anatomical site of the rectal injury, associated intra-abdominal injuries and their management were recorded. Infectious complications and mortality were noted. Intraperitoneal rectal injuries were primarily repaired, with or without faecal diversion. Extraperitoneal rectal injuries were generally left untouched, and a diverting loop colostomy done. Intraperitoneal bladder injuries were primarily repaired and extraperitoneal bladder injuries were repaired from within the bladder. Pelvic and spinal fractures were copiously lavaged. Presacral drainage and DRW were not performed. Results: One-hundred and four (101: gunshot; 3: stab) patients with 134 rectal injuries [intraperitoneal (10), extraperitoneal (64), combined (30)] were identified. Transpelvic trajectory was identified in 75 (72.12%) patients. Associated genitourinary tract injuries occurred in 42 (40.38%) patients and included 27 (25.96%) bladder injuries [intraperitoneal (9), extraperitoneal (4), combined (14)] and seven (6.73%) distal ureter injuries. Fifty patients 6 (48.08%) had associated bony injuries: sacrum (22), iliac (9), pubic rami (5), coccyx (1), acetabulum (3), femur (6), vertebral fractures (3) and pelvic joints (5). Eight (7.69%) patients had an associated vascular injury [iliac veins (4), iliac arteries (4)]. Two extraperitoneal rectal injuries were repaired. Diverting loop colostomies (91) and three Hartmann's type procedures were done for the remaining untouched extraperitoneal rectal injuries. None had PSD or DRW. Nine (6.7%) fistulae were recorded: three rectocutaneous, three rectovesical, one small bowel cutaneous, one vesicocutaneous and one entero-enteric. There were 27 infectious complications: surgical site infection (13), iliac blade and sacral osteitis (2), other soft tissue infections (12). Conclusion: Extraperitoneal rectal injuries due to low-velocity trauma can be safely managed by faecal diversion, without repair, DRW and PSD with minimal morbidity.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41562
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:33.643Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Division of General Surgery
publisherStr Division of General Surgery
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41562 Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre Govender, Terron Navsaria, Pradeep Penetrating trauma, rectal injury, bladder injury, extraperitoneal, intraperitoneal Background: Rectal injuries are associated with significant morbidity. Primary repair of extraperitoneal rectal injuries, presacral drainage (PSD) and distal rectal washout (DRW) have become historical adjuncts. Aim: A retrospective review was performed to determine the outcome of rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre with a high incidence of penetrating trauma where a simple surgical management approach to these injuries is practiced. Methods: The records of all patients with a full-thickness penetrating rectal injury admitted to the Trauma Centre at Groote Schuur Hospital over a 10-year period (January 2010 – December 2019) were reviewed. Basic demographics, injury mechanism and perioperative management, anatomical site of the rectal injury, associated intra-abdominal injuries and their management were recorded. Infectious complications and mortality were noted. Intraperitoneal rectal injuries were primarily repaired, with or without faecal diversion. Extraperitoneal rectal injuries were generally left untouched, and a diverting loop colostomy done. Intraperitoneal bladder injuries were primarily repaired and extraperitoneal bladder injuries were repaired from within the bladder. Pelvic and spinal fractures were copiously lavaged. Presacral drainage and DRW were not performed. Results: One-hundred and four (101: gunshot; 3: stab) patients with 134 rectal injuries [intraperitoneal (10), extraperitoneal (64), combined (30)] were identified. Transpelvic trajectory was identified in 75 (72.12%) patients. Associated genitourinary tract injuries occurred in 42 (40.38%) patients and included 27 (25.96%) bladder injuries [intraperitoneal (9), extraperitoneal (4), combined (14)] and seven (6.73%) distal ureter injuries. Fifty patients 6 (48.08%) had associated bony injuries: sacrum (22), iliac (9), pubic rami (5), coccyx (1), acetabulum (3), femur (6), vertebral fractures (3) and pelvic joints (5). Eight (7.69%) patients had an associated vascular injury [iliac veins (4), iliac arteries (4)]. Two extraperitoneal rectal injuries were repaired. Diverting loop colostomies (91) and three Hartmann's type procedures were done for the remaining untouched extraperitoneal rectal injuries. None had PSD or DRW. Nine (6.7%) fistulae were recorded: three rectocutaneous, three rectovesical, one small bowel cutaneous, one vesicocutaneous and one entero-enteric. There were 27 infectious complications: surgical site infection (13), iliac blade and sacral osteitis (2), other soft tissue infections (12). Conclusion: Extraperitoneal rectal injuries due to low-velocity trauma can be safely managed by faecal diversion, without repair, DRW and PSD with minimal morbidity. 2025-08-11T06:16:49Z 2025-08-11T06:16:49Z 2025 2025-08-11T06:12:44Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41562 en eng application/pdf Division of General Surgery Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Penetrating trauma, rectal injury, bladder injury, extraperitoneal, intraperitoneal
Govender, Terron
Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre
title_full Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre
title_fullStr Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre
title_full_unstemmed Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre
title_short Management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre
title_sort management of civilian penetrating rectal injuries in an urban trauma centre
topic Penetrating trauma, rectal injury, bladder injury, extraperitoneal, intraperitoneal
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41562
work_keys_str_mv AT govenderterron managementofcivilianpenetratingrectalinjuriesinanurbantraumacentre