Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct

The issue of sexual misconduct in universities has come to a head in South Africa in recent years. Among the concerns that have been raised in student protests, scholarly studies, and research by the Department of Higher Education and Training is the question of effective institutional mechanisms to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moyo, Grace
Other Authors: Smythe, Deirdre
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Department of Public Law 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613878194536448
access_status_str Open Access
author Moyo, Grace
author2 Smythe, Deirdre
author_browse Moyo, Grace
Smythe, Deirdre
author_facet Smythe, Deirdre
Moyo, Grace
author_sort Moyo, Grace
collection Thesis
description The issue of sexual misconduct in universities has come to a head in South Africa in recent years. Among the concerns that have been raised in student protests, scholarly studies, and research by the Department of Higher Education and Training is the question of effective institutional mechanisms to resolve complaints of sexual misconduct. This research is concerned with the disciplinary processes employed by universities to adjudicate complaints and impose disciplinary measures. The question asked is whether South African universities have policies on sexual misconduct that provide for just and victim-supportive processes, and what measures must be put in place in order for them to do so? My premise for this thesis is that an outcome is just if the determinative method is just, and as such I rely on the theory of Natural Justice and procedural fairness as the framework for developing a just process. I approach this question from a policy perspective, with a focus on developing and implementing policies that lay out disciplinary procedures for sexual misconduct that are responsive to the needs of victims and cognisant of the procedural fairness rights of accused students. I do this by analysing the sexual misconduct policies of thirteen public universities to understand their disciplinary procedures and institutional approaches to sexual misconduct as a whole. I find that, in general, university policies are lacking in so far as providing clear procedural rules and guidelines for disciplinary tribunals that allow for just and victim-supportive adjudication. Current policies provide for an imbalanced adjudication system or do not provide sufficient guidelines for adjudication at all. Ultimately, I make recommendations on how a hybrid model of adjudication can be fashioned; one that takes into account the need for procedural fairness in administrative decision-making, while simultaneously incorporating victim-supportive practices to minimise the trauma that disciplinary processes can inflict on victims of sexual misconduct. Among these recommendations are the inclusion of restorative justice practices in adjudication and sanctioning, the creation of an accusatorial/inquisitorial hybrid model of adjudication, and imposing justifiable limitations on the rules of Natural Justice to create a disciplinary process that is both just and victim-supportive.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41792
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:43:08.598Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41792 From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct Moyo, Grace Smythe, Deirdre Misconduct Sexual misconduct The issue of sexual misconduct in universities has come to a head in South Africa in recent years. Among the concerns that have been raised in student protests, scholarly studies, and research by the Department of Higher Education and Training is the question of effective institutional mechanisms to resolve complaints of sexual misconduct. This research is concerned with the disciplinary processes employed by universities to adjudicate complaints and impose disciplinary measures. The question asked is whether South African universities have policies on sexual misconduct that provide for just and victim-supportive processes, and what measures must be put in place in order for them to do so? My premise for this thesis is that an outcome is just if the determinative method is just, and as such I rely on the theory of Natural Justice and procedural fairness as the framework for developing a just process. I approach this question from a policy perspective, with a focus on developing and implementing policies that lay out disciplinary procedures for sexual misconduct that are responsive to the needs of victims and cognisant of the procedural fairness rights of accused students. I do this by analysing the sexual misconduct policies of thirteen public universities to understand their disciplinary procedures and institutional approaches to sexual misconduct as a whole. I find that, in general, university policies are lacking in so far as providing clear procedural rules and guidelines for disciplinary tribunals that allow for just and victim-supportive adjudication. Current policies provide for an imbalanced adjudication system or do not provide sufficient guidelines for adjudication at all. Ultimately, I make recommendations on how a hybrid model of adjudication can be fashioned; one that takes into account the need for procedural fairness in administrative decision-making, while simultaneously incorporating victim-supportive practices to minimise the trauma that disciplinary processes can inflict on victims of sexual misconduct. Among these recommendations are the inclusion of restorative justice practices in adjudication and sanctioning, the creation of an accusatorial/inquisitorial hybrid model of adjudication, and imposing justifiable limitations on the rules of Natural Justice to create a disciplinary process that is both just and victim-supportive. 2025-09-12T09:17:27Z 2025-09-12T09:17:27Z 2025 2025-09-12T08:25:12Z Thesis / Dissertation Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41792 en eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Misconduct
Sexual misconduct
Moyo, Grace
From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct
title_full From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct
title_fullStr From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct
title_full_unstemmed From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct
title_short From re-traumatisation to rightful recourse: designing just and victim-supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct
title_sort from re traumatisation to rightful recourse designing just and victim supportive policies for disciplining campus sexual misconduct
topic Misconduct
Sexual misconduct
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41792
work_keys_str_mv AT moyograce fromretraumatisationtorightfulrecoursedesigningjustandvictimsupportivepoliciesfordiscipliningcampussexualmisconduct