Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting

Background: Determining lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) aetiology is complex. Culture-based methods are laborious with poor sensitivity. Molecular assays improve detection of potential pathogens, but incorrect interpretation of results may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Der Westhuyzen, Mene
Other Authors: Moodley, Clinton
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Department of Pathology 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613344079282176
access_status_str Open Access
author Van Der Westhuyzen, Mene
author2 Moodley, Clinton
author_browse Moodley, Clinton
Van Der Westhuyzen, Mene
author_facet Moodley, Clinton
Van Der Westhuyzen, Mene
author_sort Van Der Westhuyzen, Mene
collection Thesis
description Background: Determining lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) aetiology is complex. Culture-based methods are laborious with poor sensitivity. Molecular assays improve detection of potential pathogens, but incorrect interpretation of results may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. Methods: The utility of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (FA-PP) to detect LRTI pathogens, and the potential antimicrobial stewardship impacts in a low resource setting, was assessed. Routine LRT samples were included from adult patients with clinically suspected LRTI or with a concomitant blood culture at Groote Schuur Hospital and referring facilities. Culture and FA-PP results were compared, and pharmacy data analysed to determine appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. Results: There was an 80% correlation between cultured LRTI pathogens and the FA-PP bin ≥107 results. Compared to culture the FA-PP detected substantially more pathogens (86,6% versus 17,9%) and produced a combined 100% positive percent agreement, and 88% negative percent agreement. The FA-PP detected bacterial-viral coinfections in 27% of samples. Correlation of FA-PP results with pharmacy data (n=69) indicated a potential antibiotic change in 75% of cases, but this is difficult to accurately characterise without a ‘gold-standard' for treatment or complete clinical data. Conclusion: The FA-PP increased the number of positive samples with typical bacteria, but the semi-quantitative reporting algorithm does not describe the correlation between the different bin values and colonization versus infection. This complicates result interpretation and may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. This study highlights the potential positive impact of rapid molecular assays for routine care in lower income settings, but also underscores the interpretive challenges associated with these tests.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41980
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:39.078Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Department of Pathology
publisherStr Department of Pathology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/41980 Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting Van Der Westhuyzen, Mene Moodley, Clinton Syndromic testing Background: Determining lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) aetiology is complex. Culture-based methods are laborious with poor sensitivity. Molecular assays improve detection of potential pathogens, but incorrect interpretation of results may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. Methods: The utility of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (FA-PP) to detect LRTI pathogens, and the potential antimicrobial stewardship impacts in a low resource setting, was assessed. Routine LRT samples were included from adult patients with clinically suspected LRTI or with a concomitant blood culture at Groote Schuur Hospital and referring facilities. Culture and FA-PP results were compared, and pharmacy data analysed to determine appropriateness of antibiotic therapy. Results: There was an 80% correlation between cultured LRTI pathogens and the FA-PP bin ≥107 results. Compared to culture the FA-PP detected substantially more pathogens (86,6% versus 17,9%) and produced a combined 100% positive percent agreement, and 88% negative percent agreement. The FA-PP detected bacterial-viral coinfections in 27% of samples. Correlation of FA-PP results with pharmacy data (n=69) indicated a potential antibiotic change in 75% of cases, but this is difficult to accurately characterise without a ‘gold-standard' for treatment or complete clinical data. Conclusion: The FA-PP increased the number of positive samples with typical bacteria, but the semi-quantitative reporting algorithm does not describe the correlation between the different bin values and colonization versus infection. This complicates result interpretation and may lead to inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. This study highlights the potential positive impact of rapid molecular assays for routine care in lower income settings, but also underscores the interpretive challenges associated with these tests. 2025-10-02T12:04:05Z 2025-10-02T12:04:05Z 2025 2025-10-02T11:06:13Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41980 en eng application/pdf Department of Pathology Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Syndromic testing
Van Der Westhuyzen, Mene
Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting
title_full Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting
title_fullStr Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting
title_short Utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower-respiratory tract infections in a low-middle-income setting
title_sort utility of the biofire filmarray pneumonia panel plus assay for syndromic testing of lower respiratory tract infections in a low middle income setting
topic Syndromic testing
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41980
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderwesthuyzenmene utilityofthebiofirefilmarraypneumoniapanelplusassayforsyndromictestingoflowerrespiratorytractinfectionsinalowmiddleincomesetting