Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region

Rewilding represents more than just the reintroduction of iconic charismatic species; it holds the potential to assist in reestablishing critical ecosystem functions, helping create dynamic, resilient, and self-sustaining ecosystems. Here I test the general idea that the reintroduction of megafauna...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Faria, Alexandro Carlos
Other Authors: Janion-Scheepers, Charlene
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Department of Biological Sciences 2025
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614235828158464
access_status_str Open Access
author Faria, Alexandro Carlos
author2 Janion-Scheepers, Charlene
author_browse Faria, Alexandro Carlos
Janion-Scheepers, Charlene
author_facet Janion-Scheepers, Charlene
Faria, Alexandro Carlos
author_sort Faria, Alexandro Carlos
collection Thesis
description Rewilding represents more than just the reintroduction of iconic charismatic species; it holds the potential to assist in reestablishing critical ecosystem functions, helping create dynamic, resilient, and self-sustaining ecosystems. Here I test the general idea that the reintroduction of megafauna such as elephant, rhino, and buffalo will alter soil and vegetation characteristics as well as dung beetle assemblages via megafauna trampling and feeding behaviours, ultimately improving ecosystem health. This was conducted in two different vegetation types, Montagu Shale Renosterveld and Western Klein Karoo. By examining these key indicators of ecosystem health, this research has revealed that the rewilded areas generally exhibit higher levels of dung beetle abundance (up to 3.7 times higher than livestock areas), improved soil dynamics (e.g. 11–12% lower bulk density), and greater vegetation productivity as shown by EVI trends. The study also investigated the potential of leveraging carbon credits as a means to fund restoration projects in semi-arid settings, but ultimately concluded that a more nuanced approach is likely needed in the form of biodiversity credits. Ultimately, this study provides tentative evidence that well-managed rewilding can indeed assist in restoring degraded landscapes. This, in turn, reaffirms the crucial role of nature-based solutions in biodiversity conservation and highlights the importance of positive land stewardship and management. These findings underscore the importance and viability of embracing rewilding as a legitimate method by which to protect and regenerate degraded landscapes. In addition, this study illustrates how the impact of rewilding is not uniform across ecosystem types by comparing findings between the two stated vegetation types. All these findings suggest that a more holistic approach is needed to evaluate and value rewilding initiatives, one which includes key ecological variables such as vegetation dynamics, various soil characteristics, and insect populations. By taking an interdisciplinary approach to conservation through combining rigorous ecological assessments with innovative financing mechanisms (such as biodiversity credits) in the future, it is more likely to capture the multifaceted benefits of rewilding and foster long-term ecosystem resilience. This comprehensive strategy is pivotal for transforming biodiversity conservation and ensuring robust ecological recovery across diverse landscapes, while increasing the likelihood of financial viability and sustainability of rewilding projects.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42268
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:48:49.664Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2025
publishDateRange 2025
publishDateSort 2025
publisher Department of Biological Sciences
publisherStr Department of Biological Sciences
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42268 How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region Faria, Alexandro Carlos Janion-Scheepers, Charlene Hawkins, Heidi Midgley, Guy Rewilding Ecosystem health Rewilding represents more than just the reintroduction of iconic charismatic species; it holds the potential to assist in reestablishing critical ecosystem functions, helping create dynamic, resilient, and self-sustaining ecosystems. Here I test the general idea that the reintroduction of megafauna such as elephant, rhino, and buffalo will alter soil and vegetation characteristics as well as dung beetle assemblages via megafauna trampling and feeding behaviours, ultimately improving ecosystem health. This was conducted in two different vegetation types, Montagu Shale Renosterveld and Western Klein Karoo. By examining these key indicators of ecosystem health, this research has revealed that the rewilded areas generally exhibit higher levels of dung beetle abundance (up to 3.7 times higher than livestock areas), improved soil dynamics (e.g. 11–12% lower bulk density), and greater vegetation productivity as shown by EVI trends. The study also investigated the potential of leveraging carbon credits as a means to fund restoration projects in semi-arid settings, but ultimately concluded that a more nuanced approach is likely needed in the form of biodiversity credits. Ultimately, this study provides tentative evidence that well-managed rewilding can indeed assist in restoring degraded landscapes. This, in turn, reaffirms the crucial role of nature-based solutions in biodiversity conservation and highlights the importance of positive land stewardship and management. These findings underscore the importance and viability of embracing rewilding as a legitimate method by which to protect and regenerate degraded landscapes. In addition, this study illustrates how the impact of rewilding is not uniform across ecosystem types by comparing findings between the two stated vegetation types. All these findings suggest that a more holistic approach is needed to evaluate and value rewilding initiatives, one which includes key ecological variables such as vegetation dynamics, various soil characteristics, and insect populations. By taking an interdisciplinary approach to conservation through combining rigorous ecological assessments with innovative financing mechanisms (such as biodiversity credits) in the future, it is more likely to capture the multifaceted benefits of rewilding and foster long-term ecosystem resilience. This comprehensive strategy is pivotal for transforming biodiversity conservation and ensuring robust ecological recovery across diverse landscapes, while increasing the likelihood of financial viability and sustainability of rewilding projects. 2025-11-19T07:23:38Z 2025-11-19T07:23:38Z 2025 2025-11-19T07:20:27Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42268 en eng application/pdf Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Rewilding
Ecosystem health
Faria, Alexandro Carlos
How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region
thesis_degree_str Master's
title How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region
title_full How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region
title_fullStr How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region
title_full_unstemmed How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region
title_short How rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi-arid region
title_sort how rewilding impacts ecosystem health in a semi arid region
topic Rewilding
Ecosystem health
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42268
work_keys_str_mv AT fariaalexandrocarlos howrewildingimpactsecosystemhealthinasemiaridregion