Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Background: Effective pain management in mass casualty scenarios (MCS) is critical due to the high prevalence of severe pain and its association with increased morbidity. MCS, defined as incidents where patient care needs exceed available resources, pose unique challenges for prehospital care provid...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Division of Emergency Medicine
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613169640275968 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Morris, Christopher |
| author2 | Hodkinson, Peter |
| author_browse | Hodkinson, Peter Morris, Christopher |
| author_facet | Hodkinson, Peter Morris, Christopher |
| author_sort | Morris, Christopher |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Background: Effective pain management in mass casualty scenarios (MCS) is critical due to the high prevalence of severe pain and its association with increased morbidity. MCS, defined as incidents where patient care needs exceed available resources, pose unique challenges for prehospital care providers. This scoping review aims to synthesize existing evidence on prehospital pain management strategies, identify gaps, and inform future research and policy development. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across major medical databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) and grey literature repositories, covering studies published from 2005 to 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed English-language studies addressing prehospital pain management in MCS, reporting on pain assessment, pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions, or resource limitations. Excluded were hospital-based studies and non-evidence-based publications. Data were charted and synthesized into thematic categories. Results: The review included 22 studies, highlighting significant gaps in standardised pain management protocols and documentation. Key findings revealed underutilisation of analgesics, with only 3.2% of MCS cases receiving pain medication. Ketamine and regional anaesthesia emerged as viable options, particularly in resource-limited settings, while novel delivery systems like autoinjectors showed promise. Major barriers included resource shortages, provider training gaps, and limited integration of pain management in triage systems. Conclusion: Prehospital pain management in MCS requires scalable, evidence-based protocols emphasising early analgesic administration, particularly ketamine and multimodal strategies. Systemic barriers, including inadequate training and documentation, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these gaps through improved training, simplified protocols, and better resource planning can enhance patient outcomes and disaster response capabilities. Future research should prioritise paediatric care and standardised outcome measures to further refine pain management in diverse MCS contexts. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42515 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:31:52.071Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | Division of Emergency Medicine |
| publisherStr | Division of Emergency Medicine |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42515 Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review Morris, Christopher Hodkinson, Peter mass casualty scenarios pain scoping review Background: Effective pain management in mass casualty scenarios (MCS) is critical due to the high prevalence of severe pain and its association with increased morbidity. MCS, defined as incidents where patient care needs exceed available resources, pose unique challenges for prehospital care providers. This scoping review aims to synthesize existing evidence on prehospital pain management strategies, identify gaps, and inform future research and policy development. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across major medical databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) and grey literature repositories, covering studies published from 2005 to 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed English-language studies addressing prehospital pain management in MCS, reporting on pain assessment, pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions, or resource limitations. Excluded were hospital-based studies and non-evidence-based publications. Data were charted and synthesized into thematic categories. Results: The review included 22 studies, highlighting significant gaps in standardised pain management protocols and documentation. Key findings revealed underutilisation of analgesics, with only 3.2% of MCS cases receiving pain medication. Ketamine and regional anaesthesia emerged as viable options, particularly in resource-limited settings, while novel delivery systems like autoinjectors showed promise. Major barriers included resource shortages, provider training gaps, and limited integration of pain management in triage systems. Conclusion: Prehospital pain management in MCS requires scalable, evidence-based protocols emphasising early analgesic administration, particularly ketamine and multimodal strategies. Systemic barriers, including inadequate training and documentation, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these gaps through improved training, simplified protocols, and better resource planning can enhance patient outcomes and disaster response capabilities. Future research should prioritise paediatric care and standardised outcome measures to further refine pain management in diverse MCS contexts. 2026-01-09T11:30:50Z 2026-01-09T11:30:50Z 2025 2026-01-09T07:16:19Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters Masters http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42515 eng application/pdf Division of Emergency Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | mass casualty scenarios pain scoping review Morris, Christopher Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review |
| title_full | Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review |
| title_fullStr | Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review |
| title_short | Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review |
| title_sort | prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios a scoping review |
| topic | mass casualty scenarios pain scoping review |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42515 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT morrischristopher prehospitalpainmanagementinmasscasualtyscenariosascopingreview |