Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review

Background: Effective pain management in mass casualty scenarios (MCS) is critical due to the high prevalence of severe pain and its association with increased morbidity. MCS, defined as incidents where patient care needs exceed available resources, pose unique challenges for prehospital care provid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morris, Christopher
Other Authors: Hodkinson, Peter
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Division of Emergency Medicine 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613169640275968
access_status_str Open Access
author Morris, Christopher
author2 Hodkinson, Peter
author_browse Hodkinson, Peter
Morris, Christopher
author_facet Hodkinson, Peter
Morris, Christopher
author_sort Morris, Christopher
collection Thesis
description Background: Effective pain management in mass casualty scenarios (MCS) is critical due to the high prevalence of severe pain and its association with increased morbidity. MCS, defined as incidents where patient care needs exceed available resources, pose unique challenges for prehospital care providers. This scoping review aims to synthesize existing evidence on prehospital pain management strategies, identify gaps, and inform future research and policy development. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across major medical databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) and grey literature repositories, covering studies published from 2005 to 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed English-language studies addressing prehospital pain management in MCS, reporting on pain assessment, pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions, or resource limitations. Excluded were hospital-based studies and non-evidence-based publications. Data were charted and synthesized into thematic categories. Results: The review included 22 studies, highlighting significant gaps in standardised pain management protocols and documentation. Key findings revealed underutilisation of analgesics, with only 3.2% of MCS cases receiving pain medication. Ketamine and regional anaesthesia emerged as viable options, particularly in resource-limited settings, while novel delivery systems like autoinjectors showed promise. Major barriers included resource shortages, provider training gaps, and limited integration of pain management in triage systems. Conclusion: Prehospital pain management in MCS requires scalable, evidence-based protocols emphasising early analgesic administration, particularly ketamine and multimodal strategies. Systemic barriers, including inadequate training and documentation, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these gaps through improved training, simplified protocols, and better resource planning can enhance patient outcomes and disaster response capabilities. Future research should prioritise paediatric care and standardised outcome measures to further refine pain management in diverse MCS contexts.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42515
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:52.071Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher Division of Emergency Medicine
publisherStr Division of Emergency Medicine
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42515 Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review Morris, Christopher Hodkinson, Peter mass casualty scenarios pain scoping review Background: Effective pain management in mass casualty scenarios (MCS) is critical due to the high prevalence of severe pain and its association with increased morbidity. MCS, defined as incidents where patient care needs exceed available resources, pose unique challenges for prehospital care providers. This scoping review aims to synthesize existing evidence on prehospital pain management strategies, identify gaps, and inform future research and policy development. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across major medical databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science) and grey literature repositories, covering studies published from 2005 to 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed English-language studies addressing prehospital pain management in MCS, reporting on pain assessment, pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions, or resource limitations. Excluded were hospital-based studies and non-evidence-based publications. Data were charted and synthesized into thematic categories. Results: The review included 22 studies, highlighting significant gaps in standardised pain management protocols and documentation. Key findings revealed underutilisation of analgesics, with only 3.2% of MCS cases receiving pain medication. Ketamine and regional anaesthesia emerged as viable options, particularly in resource-limited settings, while novel delivery systems like autoinjectors showed promise. Major barriers included resource shortages, provider training gaps, and limited integration of pain management in triage systems. Conclusion: Prehospital pain management in MCS requires scalable, evidence-based protocols emphasising early analgesic administration, particularly ketamine and multimodal strategies. Systemic barriers, including inadequate training and documentation, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these gaps through improved training, simplified protocols, and better resource planning can enhance patient outcomes and disaster response capabilities. Future research should prioritise paediatric care and standardised outcome measures to further refine pain management in diverse MCS contexts. 2026-01-09T11:30:50Z 2026-01-09T11:30:50Z 2025 2026-01-09T07:16:19Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters Masters http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42515 eng application/pdf Division of Emergency Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle mass casualty scenarios
pain
scoping review
Morris, Christopher
Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review
title_full Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review
title_fullStr Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review
title_short Prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios: a scoping review
title_sort prehospital pain management in mass casualty scenarios a scoping review
topic mass casualty scenarios
pain
scoping review
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42515
work_keys_str_mv AT morrischristopher prehospitalpainmanagementinmasscasualtyscenariosascopingreview