Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective
Does the statism of developmentalism have no regard for freedom? This paper re-examines political and theoretical premises of the developmentalist tradition in economics and argues that it embeds a conception of freedom known as neo-Roman freedom, distinct from that of the liberal tradition and more...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
School of Economics
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613301313110016 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Okello, Ayai Charles |
| author2 | Ross, Donald |
| author_browse | Okello, Ayai Charles Ross, Donald |
| author_facet | Ross, Donald Okello, Ayai Charles |
| author_sort | Okello, Ayai Charles |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Does the statism of developmentalism have no regard for freedom? This paper re-examines political and theoretical premises of the developmentalist tradition in economics and argues that it embeds a conception of freedom known as neo-Roman freedom, distinct from that of the liberal tradition and more recently, the capability approach. To this end, the writings of four key periods/schools in the developmentalist tradition, that form the case studies of this paper, are reviewed. These are: Early Modern Europe, the American School, Meiji Japan and the Latin American School. While both the liberal tradition and capability approach focus on the individual as the primary unit of analysis, the neo-Roman conception views the freedom of the individual as derivative of the freedom of the collective, embodied by the state. Thus, this analysis – the legacy of the Roman Republic and the concept of the free state as formulated by Niccolò Machiavelli – sees in national sovereignty the path to securing individual freedoms. Also discussed is why developmentalism, through history, has aimed at industrialisation of countries in the periphery. This paper suggests that the answer is more political than economic, that is, industrialisation provides the material basis for national autonomy through the development of autonomous productive capabilities. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42587 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | English eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:33:57.504Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | School of Economics |
| publisherStr | School of Economics |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42587 The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective Okello, Ayai Charles Ross, Donald Neo-Roman Freedom Does the statism of developmentalism have no regard for freedom? This paper re-examines political and theoretical premises of the developmentalist tradition in economics and argues that it embeds a conception of freedom known as neo-Roman freedom, distinct from that of the liberal tradition and more recently, the capability approach. To this end, the writings of four key periods/schools in the developmentalist tradition, that form the case studies of this paper, are reviewed. These are: Early Modern Europe, the American School, Meiji Japan and the Latin American School. While both the liberal tradition and capability approach focus on the individual as the primary unit of analysis, the neo-Roman conception views the freedom of the individual as derivative of the freedom of the collective, embodied by the state. Thus, this analysis – the legacy of the Roman Republic and the concept of the free state as formulated by Niccolò Machiavelli – sees in national sovereignty the path to securing individual freedoms. Also discussed is why developmentalism, through history, has aimed at industrialisation of countries in the periphery. This paper suggests that the answer is more political than economic, that is, industrialisation provides the material basis for national autonomy through the development of autonomous productive capabilities. 2026-01-16T09:57:24Z 2026-01-16T09:57:24Z 2025 2026-01-15T08:30:14Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42587 en eng application/pdf School of Economics Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Neo-Roman Freedom Okello, Ayai Charles The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective |
| title_full | The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective |
| title_fullStr | The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective |
| title_short | The neo-Roman conception of freedom in developmentalism: A historical perspective |
| title_sort | neo roman conception of freedom in developmentalism a historical perspective |
| topic | Neo-Roman Freedom |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42587 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT okelloayaicharles theneoromanconceptionoffreedomindevelopmentalismahistoricalperspective AT okelloayaicharles neoromanconceptionoffreedomindevelopmentalismahistoricalperspective |