Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b

Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b has been discussed by many in passing, and few in detail. The poem contains the Ovidian lover's second attempt at a renuntiatio amoris, and (arguably) comprises two parts of a whole: in 3.11a, the lover boasts to have emancipated himself from love's shackles and proceeds to out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shayne, Ryan
Other Authors: Shelton, Matthew
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: School of Languages and Literatures 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613198836826112
access_status_str Open Access
author Shayne, Ryan
author2 Shelton, Matthew
author_browse Shayne, Ryan
Shelton, Matthew
author_facet Shelton, Matthew
Shayne, Ryan
author_sort Shayne, Ryan
collection Thesis
description Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b has been discussed by many in passing, and few in detail. The poem contains the Ovidian lover's second attempt at a renuntiatio amoris, and (arguably) comprises two parts of a whole: in 3.11a, the lover boasts to have emancipated himself from love's shackles and proceeds to outline the reasons for his renunciation (largely his beloved's indiscretions); in 3.11b, however, he backtracks into a drawn-out internal conflict between his love and hate for her, that exhausts in elaborate detail the Catullan odi et amo idea. Because in this poem elegiac commonplaces abound, and because of Ovid's verbal dexterity and allusiveness, the poem has often been deemed simply a playful parody of or variation on the Catullan theme: that is, insincere and not at all serious. Few have considered the possibility that in 3.11 we ought to take Ovid more seriously than elsewhere. I aim to show that there is good reason to do so: that the poem's irony and humour need not preclude seriousness, and that its literariness does not come at the expense of emotional intensity. Ovid's elegiac lover in the Amores, like the praeceptor in the Remedia Amoris, treats love as a game to be won through strategy and artifice. I suggest that, in Am. 3.11, Ovid reflects on the inevitable failure of this approach. By considering Ovid's use of intertextuality and intratextuality, and the difference between the Ovidian lover's attitude in Am. 3.11 and elsewhere in the Amores, I argue that the poem voices a serious concern: the lover's attempts to conquer love inevitably fail, because love conquers all; it cannot be treated as a game, because it is not one — at least not one that he can win.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42679
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:20.328Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher School of Languages and Literatures
publisherStr School of Languages and Literatures
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42679 OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b Shayne, Ryan Shelton, Matthew Ovid's Amores OMNIA VINCIT AMOR Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b has been discussed by many in passing, and few in detail. The poem contains the Ovidian lover's second attempt at a renuntiatio amoris, and (arguably) comprises two parts of a whole: in 3.11a, the lover boasts to have emancipated himself from love's shackles and proceeds to outline the reasons for his renunciation (largely his beloved's indiscretions); in 3.11b, however, he backtracks into a drawn-out internal conflict between his love and hate for her, that exhausts in elaborate detail the Catullan odi et amo idea. Because in this poem elegiac commonplaces abound, and because of Ovid's verbal dexterity and allusiveness, the poem has often been deemed simply a playful parody of or variation on the Catullan theme: that is, insincere and not at all serious. Few have considered the possibility that in 3.11 we ought to take Ovid more seriously than elsewhere. I aim to show that there is good reason to do so: that the poem's irony and humour need not preclude seriousness, and that its literariness does not come at the expense of emotional intensity. Ovid's elegiac lover in the Amores, like the praeceptor in the Remedia Amoris, treats love as a game to be won through strategy and artifice. I suggest that, in Am. 3.11, Ovid reflects on the inevitable failure of this approach. By considering Ovid's use of intertextuality and intratextuality, and the difference between the Ovidian lover's attitude in Am. 3.11 and elsewhere in the Amores, I argue that the poem voices a serious concern: the lover's attempts to conquer love inevitably fail, because love conquers all; it cannot be treated as a game, because it is not one — at least not one that he can win. 2026-01-26T08:00:57Z 2026-01-26T08:00:57Z 2025 2026-01-26T07:45:32Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters Masters http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42679 en eng application/pdf School of Languages and Literatures Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Ovid's Amores
OMNIA VINCIT AMOR
Shayne, Ryan
OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b
thesis_degree_str Master's
title OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b
title_full OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b
title_fullStr OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b
title_full_unstemmed OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b
title_short OMNIA VINCIT AMOR: parody and tone in Ovid's Amores 3.11a&b
title_sort omnia vincit amor parody and tone in ovid s amores 3 11a b
topic Ovid's Amores
OMNIA VINCIT AMOR
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42679
work_keys_str_mv AT shayneryan omniavincitamorparodyandtoneinovidsamores311ab