Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Sections 5(2), 32(1) and (2), of the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 have been interpreted by the Ministers of Social Development (SD) and Finance to delegate authority to them to determine the age limit of children and the income threshold of caregivers who qualify for the Child Support Grant (CSG...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Department of Public Law
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613344276414464 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Proudlock, Paula |
| author2 | Corder, Hugh |
| author_browse | Corder, Hugh Proudlock, Paula |
| author_facet | Corder, Hugh Proudlock, Paula |
| author_sort | Proudlock, Paula |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Sections 5(2), 32(1) and (2), of the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 have been interpreted by the Ministers of Social Development (SD) and Finance to delegate authority to them to determine the age limit of children and the income threshold of caregivers who qualify for the Child Support Grant (CSG). The Minister of SD, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, has promulgated two sets of regulations in terms of s32 of the Act. The first set was promulgated in February 2005 ('the 2005 regulations'). The second set, which repealed the first set, was promulgated in August 20083 ('the 2008 regulations'). In regard to the age limit, the 2005 regulations set the age limit at 14 years and the 2008 regulations set the age limit at 15 years with effect from 1 January 2009. The current age limit is therefore 15 years of age. This means that children qualify until their 15th birthday after which their grant is terminated, and that children who are already 15 years of age or older do not qualify for the CSG. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42847 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | English eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:34:39.078Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | Department of Public Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Public Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42847 The social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? Proudlock, Paula Corder, Hugh trading regulations Sections 5(2), 32(1) and (2), of the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 have been interpreted by the Ministers of Social Development (SD) and Finance to delegate authority to them to determine the age limit of children and the income threshold of caregivers who qualify for the Child Support Grant (CSG). The Minister of SD, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, has promulgated two sets of regulations in terms of s32 of the Act. The first set was promulgated in February 2005 ('the 2005 regulations'). The second set, which repealed the first set, was promulgated in August 20083 ('the 2008 regulations'). In regard to the age limit, the 2005 regulations set the age limit at 14 years and the 2008 regulations set the age limit at 15 years with effect from 1 January 2009. The current age limit is therefore 15 years of age. This means that children qualify until their 15th birthday after which their grant is terminated, and that children who are already 15 years of age or older do not qualify for the CSG. 2026-02-16T10:55:11Z 2026-02-16T10:55:11Z 2010 2026-02-16T10:51:50Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42847 en eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | trading regulations Proudlock, Paula The social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | The social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? |
| title_full | The social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? |
| title_fullStr | The social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? |
| title_full_unstemmed | The social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? |
| title_short | The social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers. is the delegation constitutional? |
| title_sort | social assistance act has been interpreted to delegate the decisions on the qualifying age limit and income threshold for the child support grant to two executive ministers is the delegation constitutional |
| topic | trading regulations |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42847 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT proudlockpaula thesocialassistanceacthasbeeninterpretedtodelegatethedecisionsonthequalifyingagelimitandincomethresholdforthechildsupportgranttotwoexecutiveministersisthedelegationconstitutional AT proudlockpaula socialassistanceacthasbeeninterpretedtodelegatethedecisionsonthequalifyingagelimitandincomethresholdforthechildsupportgranttotwoexecutiveministersisthedelegationconstitutional |