Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust

It is sometimes said that taxation is the price we pay for civilisation. 1 What is perhaps not said as often is that not every citizen or organisation pays taxes, nor are many of them, and justifiably at that, obliged to do so. The share incentive trust, according to the highest court of the land, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Esat, Intikab-Alam
Other Authors: Emslie, Trevor
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Centre for Law and Society 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613731487219712
access_status_str Open Access
author Esat, Intikab-Alam
author2 Emslie, Trevor
author_browse Emslie, Trevor
Esat, Intikab-Alam
author_facet Emslie, Trevor
Esat, Intikab-Alam
author_sort Esat, Intikab-Alam
collection Thesis
description It is sometimes said that taxation is the price we pay for civilisation. 1 What is perhaps not said as often is that not every citizen or organisation pays taxes, nor are many of them, and justifiably at that, obliged to do so. The share incentive trust, according to the highest court of the land, is one such organisation. After a chequered, controversial, and sometimes protagonistic seven-year history, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, in C.I.R. vs Pick 'N Pay Employee Share Purchase Trust2 ruled, by a majority of 3-2, that share incentive trusts, as presently structured, are not liable for normal income tax on profits made through dealing in its founder company's shares. The Rise of the Share Incentive Trust During the boom years of the stock exchange in the late 1960's, the idea of providing a tax-free employment fringe benefit for corporate employees by the use of stock option plans gained widespread popularity. 3 Key management staff were granted options to purchase shares in their employer company exercisable in the future (subject to continued employment) at the market value prevailing on the date the options had been granted.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42870
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:48.687Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher Centre for Law and Society
publisherStr Centre for Law and Society
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42870 Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust Esat, Intikab-Alam Emslie, Trevor Case Share incentive trust It is sometimes said that taxation is the price we pay for civilisation. 1 What is perhaps not said as often is that not every citizen or organisation pays taxes, nor are many of them, and justifiably at that, obliged to do so. The share incentive trust, according to the highest court of the land, is one such organisation. After a chequered, controversial, and sometimes protagonistic seven-year history, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, in C.I.R. vs Pick 'N Pay Employee Share Purchase Trust2 ruled, by a majority of 3-2, that share incentive trusts, as presently structured, are not liable for normal income tax on profits made through dealing in its founder company's shares. The Rise of the Share Incentive Trust During the boom years of the stock exchange in the late 1960's, the idea of providing a tax-free employment fringe benefit for corporate employees by the use of stock option plans gained widespread popularity. 3 Key management staff were granted options to purchase shares in their employer company exercisable in the future (subject to continued employment) at the market value prevailing on the date the options had been granted. 2026-02-20T08:00:54Z 2026-02-20T08:00:54Z 1993 2026-02-20T07:56:50Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42870 en eng application/pdf Centre for Law and Society Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Case
Share incentive trust
Esat, Intikab-Alam
Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust
title_full Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust
title_fullStr Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust
title_full_unstemmed Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust
title_short Taking the wrong road in the capital/revenue enquiry: the controversial case of the share incentive trust
title_sort taking the wrong road in the capital revenue enquiry the controversial case of the share incentive trust
topic Case
Share incentive trust
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42870
work_keys_str_mv AT esatintikabalam takingthewrongroadinthecapitalrevenueenquirythecontroversialcaseoftheshareincentivetrust