Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Pilotage: sea the change
The Shipping Industry has recently undergone a change in legislation, which is not unusual for such a constantly evolving industry. The National Ports Act 12 of 2005 ("the Act") was approved by the National Assembly on I March 2006 and it came into operation on 26 November 2006. Most of the provisio...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Centre for Law and Society
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613616295903232 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | January, Marlene Gillian |
| author2 | Bradfield, Graham |
| author_browse | Bradfield, Graham January, Marlene Gillian |
| author_facet | Bradfield, Graham January, Marlene Gillian |
| author_sort | January, Marlene Gillian |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The Shipping Industry has recently undergone a change in legislation, which is not unusual for such a constantly evolving industry. The National Ports Act 12 of 2005 ("the Act") was approved by the National Assembly on I March 2006 and it came into operation on 26 November 2006. Most of the provisions in Chapter 9 of the Act have been kept the same as the previous legislation' however section 76 of the Act effects a significant change from the previous manner in which liability for pilot error has been treated. Under the previous dispensation both the pilot and the port authority were exempt from liability for loss or damage caused by the pilot's negligence. The onus rested with the Port Authority who had to prove that the negligence were only due to error in order to rely on the exemption of liability clause. The National Port Authority has now repealed those provisions of the previous legislation and replaced it with section 76 of the Act. Under the provisions of s 76 the exemption is for the consequences of the pilot's acts or omissions in good faith'. Under the previous dispensation, courts have interpreted the meaning of the word 'negligent' and in the last leading case2 relating to such interpretation, it left the question hanging without any final conclusion, except for the fact that the word 'negligent' should be interpreted in the narrow sense. Under the provisions of section 76 the word • negligence' has been removed and replaced with the words' good faith'. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42950 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | English eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:38:58.832Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | Centre for Law and Society |
| publisherStr | Centre for Law and Society |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42950 Pilotage: sea the change January, Marlene Gillian Bradfield, Graham Sea pilotage The Shipping Industry has recently undergone a change in legislation, which is not unusual for such a constantly evolving industry. The National Ports Act 12 of 2005 ("the Act") was approved by the National Assembly on I March 2006 and it came into operation on 26 November 2006. Most of the provisions in Chapter 9 of the Act have been kept the same as the previous legislation' however section 76 of the Act effects a significant change from the previous manner in which liability for pilot error has been treated. Under the previous dispensation both the pilot and the port authority were exempt from liability for loss or damage caused by the pilot's negligence. The onus rested with the Port Authority who had to prove that the negligence were only due to error in order to rely on the exemption of liability clause. The National Port Authority has now repealed those provisions of the previous legislation and replaced it with section 76 of the Act. Under the provisions of s 76 the exemption is for the consequences of the pilot's acts or omissions in good faith'. Under the previous dispensation, courts have interpreted the meaning of the word 'negligent' and in the last leading case2 relating to such interpretation, it left the question hanging without any final conclusion, except for the fact that the word 'negligent' should be interpreted in the narrow sense. Under the provisions of section 76 the word • negligence' has been removed and replaced with the words' good faith'. 2026-03-12T06:51:53Z 2026-03-12T06:51:53Z 2007 2026-03-12T06:49:35Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42950 en eng application/pdf Centre for Law and Society Faculty of Law University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Sea pilotage January, Marlene Gillian Pilotage: sea the change |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Pilotage: sea the change |
| title_full | Pilotage: sea the change |
| title_fullStr | Pilotage: sea the change |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pilotage: sea the change |
| title_short | Pilotage: sea the change |
| title_sort | pilotage sea the change |
| topic | Sea pilotage |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42950 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT januarymarlenegillian pilotageseathechange |