Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services

The thesis covers the field of law also known as professional negligence. It deals with three major areas of uncertainty. The first is whether South African lawyers should receive protection from' suit-similar to that which their counterparts in some Commonwealth countries currently enjoy. An analys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Midgley, John Robert
Other Authors: Hutchison, Dale
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: Department of Private Law 2026
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613164680511488
access_status_str Open Access
author Midgley, John Robert
author2 Hutchison, Dale
author_browse Hutchison, Dale
Midgley, John Robert
author_facet Hutchison, Dale
Midgley, John Robert
author_sort Midgley, John Robert
collection Thesis
description The thesis covers the field of law also known as professional negligence. It deals with three major areas of uncertainty. The first is whether South African lawyers should receive protection from' suit-similar to that which their counterparts in some Commonwealth countries currently enjoy. An analysis of the justifications for immunity from suit and a comparision of relevant principles in South Africa and in the countries which grant protection to lawyers indicate that immunity is not a suitable form of protection. General principles of contractual and delictual liability should apply to lawyers. However, where lawyers can show that their conduct was pursuant to the proper administration of justice such conduct should be protected: policy dictates that contractual obligations should not be enforced, while in delict the conduct is not wrongful. The second area which is focussed upon is the foundation of lawyers' liability and whether lawyers are liable to clients concurrently in contract and in delict. The conclusion reached is that clients should have a choice of actions. In relation to the first two topics, a distinction is drawn between enquiries in which policy considerations prevent the application of substantive contractual and delictual principles and those in which public policy is considered in terms of the laws of contract and delict. Questions of concurrence of liability and protection from suit are placed in the former category. The third major topic is the question of liability to persons who are not clients. Whether it is possibe to extend contractual or delictual principles to third party situations, and the criteria to be considered in doing so, are discussed. It is concluded that delictual liability is possible in circumstances where the lawyer has knowledge of the extent to which his or her conduct is intended to affect the plaintiff, but no liability arises where the conduct accords with ethical duties, nor where any potential duty to a non-client conflicts with the lawyer's duty to a client. In addition to the above topics, general principles of lawyers' liability are set out and consideration is given to methods of reducing the risks attached to the practice of law.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/43229
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language English
eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:47.142Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher Department of Private Law
publisherStr Department of Private Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/43229 The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services Midgley, John Robert Hutchison, Dale Private Law The thesis covers the field of law also known as professional negligence. It deals with three major areas of uncertainty. The first is whether South African lawyers should receive protection from' suit-similar to that which their counterparts in some Commonwealth countries currently enjoy. An analysis of the justifications for immunity from suit and a comparision of relevant principles in South Africa and in the countries which grant protection to lawyers indicate that immunity is not a suitable form of protection. General principles of contractual and delictual liability should apply to lawyers. However, where lawyers can show that their conduct was pursuant to the proper administration of justice such conduct should be protected: policy dictates that contractual obligations should not be enforced, while in delict the conduct is not wrongful. The second area which is focussed upon is the foundation of lawyers' liability and whether lawyers are liable to clients concurrently in contract and in delict. The conclusion reached is that clients should have a choice of actions. In relation to the first two topics, a distinction is drawn between enquiries in which policy considerations prevent the application of substantive contractual and delictual principles and those in which public policy is considered in terms of the laws of contract and delict. Questions of concurrence of liability and protection from suit are placed in the former category. The third major topic is the question of liability to persons who are not clients. Whether it is possibe to extend contractual or delictual principles to third party situations, and the criteria to be considered in doing so, are discussed. It is concluded that delictual liability is possible in circumstances where the lawyer has knowledge of the extent to which his or her conduct is intended to affect the plaintiff, but no liability arises where the conduct accords with ethical duties, nor where any potential duty to a non-client conflicts with the lawyer's duty to a client. In addition to the above topics, general principles of lawyers' liability are set out and consideration is given to methods of reducing the risks attached to the practice of law. 2026-05-18T13:32:18Z 2026-05-18T13:32:18Z 1990 2024-07-19T13:00:26Z Thesis / Dissertation Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43229 en eng application/pdf Department of Private Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Private Law
Midgley, John Robert
The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services
title_full The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services
title_fullStr The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services
title_full_unstemmed The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services
title_short The nature and scope of lawyers' liability for the negligent rendering of professional services
title_sort nature and scope of lawyers liability for the negligent rendering of professional services
topic Private Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43229
work_keys_str_mv AT midgleyjohnrobert thenatureandscopeoflawyersliabilityforthenegligentrenderingofprofessionalservices
AT midgleyjohnrobert natureandscopeoflawyersliabilityforthenegligentrenderingofprofessionalservices