Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions
The principle of subsidiarity is used as a device to co-ordinate different bodies or rules which compete to achieve the same goal. It is a principle which can take on many formulations depending on the context of its application. For this study, the focus will be on the principle of subsidiarity as...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Department of Private Law
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1869483642074431488 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Barns, Shaun |
| author2 | Barnard-Naude, Jaco |
| author_browse | Barnard-Naude, Jaco Barns, Shaun |
| author_facet | Barnard-Naude, Jaco Barns, Shaun |
| author_sort | Barns, Shaun |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The principle of subsidiarity is used as a device to co-ordinate different bodies or rules which compete to achieve the same goal. It is a principle which can take on many formulations depending on the context of its application. For this study, the focus will be on the principle of subsidiarity as applied to the different arms of government in South Africa and as used in private law remedies as applied in the public sphere, specifically vicarious liability in delict. These formulations of the principle of subsidiarity are known as institutional subsidiarity and substantive subsidiarity, respectively. Currently institutional subsidiarity in South Africa takes a very broad formulation and is seen as implicit in the Constitution of South Africa when applied to the local, provincial and national spheres of government. When discussed in terms of the three arms of government, namely, the legislature; the executive and the judiciary, institutional subsidiarity is discussed under the broad principle of separation of powers. This study seeks to provide a more specific understanding of the separation of powers by translating it into a spectrum between coordination and integrity. It will use examples of tools that courts currently use to co-ordinate and co-operate with other branches. It will also explain when the courts can act without cooperation with the other branches on the other end of the spectrum called integrity. The metaphorical spectrum is useful for the courts as it helps determine what tools are available to them to exercise their constitutional function and provides a link between their institutional purpose and the related rules of substantive subsidiarity. The primary focus of the study will be substantive subsidiarity and specifically the relationship between the common law and the Constitution. The study will use cases involving state vicarious liability in delict, specifically involving the South African Police Service, to show how the previous formulation of substantive subsidiarity has resulted in irreconcilable doctrinal errors in private law. Further, it will analyse recent cases regarding constitutional damages to show that clarity is required from the courts to ensure the future of a robust state liability doctrine in South Africa. A comparative analysis of state liability in England, France and Canada is undertaken to better understand the shortcomings within the South African legal system in this regard. Finally, building on the study of subsidiarity and comparative analysis, a new framework for hard cases within state liability is developed which clearly guides when vicarious liability in delict, direct state delictual liability, constitutional damages and any other damages are appropriate within the South African legal system. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/43321 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | English eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-07-01T04:02:14.387Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publishDateRange | 2026 |
| publishDateSort | 2026 |
| publisher | Department of Private Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Private Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/43321 Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions Barns, Shaun Barnard-Naude, Jaco law The principle of subsidiarity is used as a device to co-ordinate different bodies or rules which compete to achieve the same goal. It is a principle which can take on many formulations depending on the context of its application. For this study, the focus will be on the principle of subsidiarity as applied to the different arms of government in South Africa and as used in private law remedies as applied in the public sphere, specifically vicarious liability in delict. These formulations of the principle of subsidiarity are known as institutional subsidiarity and substantive subsidiarity, respectively. Currently institutional subsidiarity in South Africa takes a very broad formulation and is seen as implicit in the Constitution of South Africa when applied to the local, provincial and national spheres of government. When discussed in terms of the three arms of government, namely, the legislature; the executive and the judiciary, institutional subsidiarity is discussed under the broad principle of separation of powers. This study seeks to provide a more specific understanding of the separation of powers by translating it into a spectrum between coordination and integrity. It will use examples of tools that courts currently use to co-ordinate and co-operate with other branches. It will also explain when the courts can act without cooperation with the other branches on the other end of the spectrum called integrity. The metaphorical spectrum is useful for the courts as it helps determine what tools are available to them to exercise their constitutional function and provides a link between their institutional purpose and the related rules of substantive subsidiarity. The primary focus of the study will be substantive subsidiarity and specifically the relationship between the common law and the Constitution. The study will use cases involving state vicarious liability in delict, specifically involving the South African Police Service, to show how the previous formulation of substantive subsidiarity has resulted in irreconcilable doctrinal errors in private law. Further, it will analyse recent cases regarding constitutional damages to show that clarity is required from the courts to ensure the future of a robust state liability doctrine in South Africa. A comparative analysis of state liability in England, France and Canada is undertaken to better understand the shortcomings within the South African legal system in this regard. Finally, building on the study of subsidiarity and comparative analysis, a new framework for hard cases within state liability is developed which clearly guides when vicarious liability in delict, direct state delictual liability, constitutional damages and any other damages are appropriate within the South African legal system. 2026-06-17T08:05:45Z 2026-06-17T08:05:45Z 2026 2026-06-17T08:03:50Z Thesis / Dissertation Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43321 en eng application/pdf Department of Private Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | law Barns, Shaun Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions |
| thesis_degree_str | Doctoral |
| title | Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions |
| title_full | Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions |
| title_fullStr | Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions |
| title_short | Constitutionally damaged: moving courageously beyond common law fictions |
| title_sort | constitutionally damaged moving courageously beyond common law fictions |
| topic | law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/43321 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT barnsshaun constitutionallydamagedmovingcourageouslybeyondcommonlawfictions |