Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The burgeoning constitutional requirement of rationality and separation of powers has rationality review gone too far?
This thesis presents an analysis of three recent judgments of our apex courts which collectively illustrate a maximising of the 'minimum threshold requirement' of rationality through the seemingly inexhaustible constitutional principle of legality. The question sought to be addressed is whether, in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Public Law
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: The burgeoning constitutional requirement of rationality and separation of powers has rationality review gone too far?
- Are the current Zambian constitutional provisions sufficient in preventing abuse of power by the executive organ of government?
- Punishing the homeless: The constitutionality of the criminalisation of homelessness in the City of Cape Town
- The application of rationality review in the Constitutional Court
- A critical examination of overreach in judicial decision-making by the Constitutional Court of South Africa
- A Different Perspective on Rationality: Rational Econs or Rational Humans?
- Redistributive justice: affirming section 9 of the constitution through the imposition of a wealth tax on apartheid beneficiaries