Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems

Includes bibliographical references.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Atkinson-Hope, Gary
Other Authors: Folly, Komla A
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Electrical Engineering 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613563763294208
access_status_str Open Access
author Atkinson-Hope, Gary
author2 Folly, Komla A
author_browse Atkinson-Hope, Gary
Folly, Komla A
author_facet Folly, Komla A
Atkinson-Hope, Gary
author_sort Atkinson-Hope, Gary
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliographical references.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/5239
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:38:08.733Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Department of Electrical Engineering
publisherStr Department of Electrical Engineering
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/5239 Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems Atkinson-Hope, Gary Folly, Komla A Electrical Engineering Includes bibliographical references. Decision analysis is a scientific tool that is traditionally applied in business and not to electrical engineering decisions. The reason for this research is to show how to use decision analysis to make a decision on the size of a power factor correction capacitor to be installed in an end-user plant in an electrical power system, that has the potential for harmonic resonance. How to make a decision as to whether or not mitigation is needed is also researched. The two-stage decision theory process, developed by management scientists, to assist decision makers on making a decision when uncertainty, risk and certainty situations-exist, is reviewed in this thesis. To understand the application of decision theory, worked examples are included to improve understanding and to provide a foundation for the new work introduced. The addition of capacitors to a harmonic carrying system can result in resonance. Harmonic levels can be magnified well above accepted limits and this can cause damage to system components, especially capacitors. Recognizing and correcting a harmonic resonance problem before disastrous consequences arise is essential for system designers. Traditionally, when considering harmonic resonance, power factor correction capacitors are sized heuristically and a power factor of 0.95 is taken as a starting point. Usually, a harmonic analysis software package is used and a frequency scan study is conducted to generate a resonance curve. Resonant points are then compared to the harmonics in the system. If there is coincidence, the technique of de-tuning is applied to overcome overlapping and to choose the capacitor size. For utilities to maintain system efficiencies at acceptable levels, they encourage end-users to use a capacitor size so that the power factor has a value greater than 0.9 and as a rule of thumb, correction is not done to unity. This traditional technique is subjective and lacks decision structure. A new three-stage decision theory process for making a harmonic resonance mitigation decision in an end-user plant is developed. Two new indices are developed to assist in making the decision. The first index assesses the severity of resonance and the second is used to make a mitigation decision. In Stage 1, a quantitative model is developed to structure and represent the decision problem with the harmonic resonance severity index as the objective function. The model uses a fixed capacitor based on full load rating as this represents the worst case. In Stage 2, Utility Theory is used as the decision criterion to select the most desirable capacitor size. In Stage 3, the mitigation index is applied to assess if mitigation is needed or not for the chosen capacitor. Three case studies, based on deterministic models are conducted and they demonstrate the effectiveness of this newly developed decision theory process. 2014-07-31T11:00:03Z 2014-07-31T11:00:03Z 2003 Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/5239 eng application/pdf Department of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Electrical Engineering
Atkinson-Hope, Gary
Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems
title_full Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems
title_fullStr Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems
title_full_unstemmed Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems
title_short Decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems
title_sort decision theory process for making a mitigation decision on harmonic resonance in power systems
topic Electrical Engineering
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/5239
work_keys_str_mv AT atkinsonhopegary decisiontheoryprocessformakingamitigationdecisiononharmonicresonanceinpowersystems