Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university

Bibliography: leaves 95-105.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pollock, Michael A
Other Authors: Eccles, Mike
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Information Systems 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614135460560896
access_status_str Open Access
author Pollock, Michael A
author2 Eccles, Mike
author_browse Eccles, Mike
Pollock, Michael A
author_facet Eccles, Mike
Pollock, Michael A
author_sort Pollock, Michael A
collection Thesis
description Bibliography: leaves 95-105.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/5660
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:47:13.946Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Department of Information Systems
publisherStr Department of Information Systems
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/5660 A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university Pollock, Michael A Eccles, Mike Information Systems Bibliography: leaves 95-105. In a field such as that of Information Systems the emergence of new technologies is one of the only constants. It is therefore necessary, indeed vital, to be able to measure, as well as anticipate, the adoption and diffusion of these new technologies into organisations. For this purpose adoption models came to the fore. Such models include the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989), the Technology Acceptance Model 2 (T AM2) (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000), the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour (DTPB) (Taylor & Todd, 1995b), and the Perceived Characteristics of Innovating model (PCI) (Moore & Benbasat, 1991). Adoption models test the perceptions and attitudes of potential and actual adopters of a new technology. Although all of the adoption models test adoption of a new technology, each tests different aspects of this adoption. Through the comparison of the four adoption models mentioned above, this study determines which constructs mostly strongly explain the adoption of a CASE tool by university students. These constructs are then combined to form a new technology adoption model, the Perceived Characteristics of Technology Adoption CPCTA), which is tested and found to explain a significant degree of variance in the context of CASE tool adoption amongst students at a university. 2014-07-31T12:18:17Z 2014-07-31T12:18:17Z 2004 Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/5660 eng application/pdf Department of Information Systems Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Information Systems
Pollock, Michael A
A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university
title_full A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university
title_fullStr A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university
title_short A comparison of alternative technology adoption models : the adoption of a CASE tool at a university
title_sort comparison of alternative technology adoption models the adoption of a case tool at a university
topic Information Systems
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/5660
work_keys_str_mv AT pollockmichaela acomparisonofalternativetechnologyadoptionmodelstheadoptionofacasetoolatauniversity
AT pollockmichaela comparisonofalternativetechnologyadoptionmodelstheadoptionofacasetoolatauniversity