Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms

Since independence in 1979 Zimbabwe has experienced periods of great conflict and instability. The chief explanation for this is the ruling party ZANU-PF's monopolistic attitude to rule. The party has historically quashed attempts at opposition, drawing its political legitimacy from its role in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Walker, Caroline
Other Authors: Nathan, Laurie
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Political Studies 2014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613897714827264
access_status_str Open Access
author Walker, Caroline
author2 Nathan, Laurie
author_browse Nathan, Laurie
Walker, Caroline
author_facet Nathan, Laurie
Walker, Caroline
author_sort Walker, Caroline
collection Thesis
description Since independence in 1979 Zimbabwe has experienced periods of great conflict and instability. The chief explanation for this is the ruling party ZANU-PF's monopolistic attitude to rule. The party has historically quashed attempts at opposition, drawing its political legitimacy from its role in the liberation struggle. 2008 election results favouring the opposition lead to ZANU-PF inflicted violence, including retributive attacks on former ZNAU-PF supporters. The SADC mandated an Mbeki-lead mediation following this violence. Mugabe accepted the mediation due to historically minimal criticism from Mbeki, yet had no intention to sincerely share power with opposition MDC factions. Even though ZANU-PF was in a legitimacy crisis it refused to cede power. This is clearly evident in the poor implementation of GPA and resuscitation of old problems as well as the development of new problems between the parties. The extent of the legitimacy crisis is an important issue here. Even though some critics laud the mediation as a landmark in the country's history and attribute it some success, the lack of respect for the agreement undermines these notions. The case highlights the difficulty for a mediator to bring positive peace, especially in the context of an historically one-party militarized state. It has further bearing on mediation in general when it shows how mediation success can only be judged in the long run, regarding parties' implementation of agreements. If power patterns remain the same post mediation, as they do in Zimbabwe, the mediation should be seen as a failure.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/6806
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:43:27.214Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Department of Political Studies
publisherStr Department of Political Studies
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/6806 A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms Walker, Caroline Nathan, Laurie Since independence in 1979 Zimbabwe has experienced periods of great conflict and instability. The chief explanation for this is the ruling party ZANU-PF's monopolistic attitude to rule. The party has historically quashed attempts at opposition, drawing its political legitimacy from its role in the liberation struggle. 2008 election results favouring the opposition lead to ZANU-PF inflicted violence, including retributive attacks on former ZNAU-PF supporters. The SADC mandated an Mbeki-lead mediation following this violence. Mugabe accepted the mediation due to historically minimal criticism from Mbeki, yet had no intention to sincerely share power with opposition MDC factions. Even though ZANU-PF was in a legitimacy crisis it refused to cede power. This is clearly evident in the poor implementation of GPA and resuscitation of old problems as well as the development of new problems between the parties. The extent of the legitimacy crisis is an important issue here. Even though some critics laud the mediation as a landmark in the country's history and attribute it some success, the lack of respect for the agreement undermines these notions. The case highlights the difficulty for a mediator to bring positive peace, especially in the context of an historically one-party militarized state. It has further bearing on mediation in general when it shows how mediation success can only be judged in the long run, regarding parties' implementation of agreements. If power patterns remain the same post mediation, as they do in Zimbabwe, the mediation should be seen as a failure. 2014-09-02T09:50:08Z 2014-09-02T09:50:08Z 2013 Master Thesis Masters MPhil http://hdl.handle.net/11427/6806 eng application/pdf Department of Political Studies Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Walker, Caroline
A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms
title_full A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms
title_fullStr A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms
title_full_unstemmed A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms
title_short A critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in Zimbabwe: an exploration of the main debates and criticisms
title_sort critical analysis of the 2008 mediation in zimbabwe an exploration of the main debates and criticisms
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/6806
work_keys_str_mv AT walkercaroline acriticalanalysisofthe2008mediationinzimbabweanexplorationofthemaindebatesandcriticisms
AT walkercaroline criticalanalysisofthe2008mediationinzimbabweanexplorationofthemaindebatesandcriticisms