Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users

Includes bibliography.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Borchers, Mark Louis
Other Authors: Dutkiewicz, Ryszard Karol
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Energy Research Centre 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613203887816704
access_status_str Open Access
author Borchers, Mark Louis
author2 Dutkiewicz, Ryszard Karol
author_browse Borchers, Mark Louis
Dutkiewicz, Ryszard Karol
author_facet Dutkiewicz, Ryszard Karol
Borchers, Mark Louis
author_sort Borchers, Mark Louis
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliography.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8291
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:24.523Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Energy Research Centre
publisherStr Energy Research Centre
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8291 A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users Borchers, Mark Louis Dutkiewicz, Ryszard Karol Energy and Development Studies Includes bibliography. The objective of this study is to compile a micro-computer based tool to aid in the evaluation of power supply options for remote sites. The options considered are stand-alone photovoltaic, diesel generation, and grid extension power supplies. The basis on which the various options are compared is the unit cost of energy expected from the system. This is determined by combining all capital costs, running costs, and other payments on a present value basis over the project lifetime. The comparison of the unit energy cost expected from each option is only meaningful if the reliability of each supply system is known. The Loss of Energy Probability of each option is therefore established to provide a common ground on which to compare these costs. • 2014-10-11T11:54:00Z 2014-10-11T11:54:00Z 1989 Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8291 eng application/pdf Energy Research Centre Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Energy and Development Studies
Borchers, Mark Louis
A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users
title_full A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users
title_fullStr A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users
title_full_unstemmed A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users
title_short A decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand-alone power supply options for remote users
title_sort decision making tool for assessing grid electrification versus stand alone power supply options for remote users
topic Energy and Development Studies
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8291
work_keys_str_mv AT borchersmarklouis adecisionmakingtoolforassessinggridelectrificationversusstandalonepowersupplyoptionsforremoteusers
AT borchersmarklouis decisionmakingtoolforassessinggridelectrificationversusstandalonepowersupplyoptionsforremoteusers