Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes

Includes bibliographical references (leaves 99-106).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Reed, Jenny
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Aids and Society Research Unit 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613182748524544
access_status_str Open Access
author Reed, Jenny
author_browse Reed, Jenny
author_facet Reed, Jenny
author_sort Reed, Jenny
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 99-106).
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8990
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:05.102Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Aids and Society Research Unit
publisherStr Aids and Society Research Unit
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8990 The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes Reed, Jenny HIV/AIDS and Society Includes bibliographical references (leaves 99-106). Many evaluations of HIV/AIDS intervention programmes continue to focus on impact and thus overlook the processes through which any given outcomes have been achieved; this has prompted a call for a more consistent focus on what happens during interventions. Therefore, this study endeavours to provide a detailed description and critical analysis of an HIV/AIDS intervention programme. Through adopting a case-based approach, the aim is to illustrate the types of understanding that stand to be gained through the application of process evaluation. A conceptual framework is established which contextualises process evaluation by defining and situating it within the broader framework of programme evaluation; a summary of the main debates in the field of evaluation research is provided. The trends in how other HIV/AIDS intervention programmes have been conceptualised, developed and implemented are discussed, in order to locate the research and to establish criteria for comprehensive evaluation of HIV/AIDS intervention programmes. It is asserted that collectively negotiated social identities shape responses and vulnerability to HIV/AIDS, due to a reciprocally determining relationship between identity, sexual behaviour, and HIV/AIDS. It is argued that an understanding of this complex relationship is essential for those who are evaluating HIV/AIDS intervention programmes. This discussion provides a set of tools for reviewing HIV/AIDS intervention programmes, and advocates that process evaluation should focus not only on the implementation and theoretical orientation of a programme, but also on its proposed pedagogy. In the light of this discussion, a model of process evaluation is developed which is tailored to address the specific challenges posed by HIV/AIDS as a topic for education and which, it is argued, enables the systematic and comprehensive assessment of HIV/AIDS intervention programmes. The model proposes a multi-layered approach to evaluation and incorporates three main categories: processual, theoretical, and pedagogical. The model dictated the guiding questions and data sources that were adopted. Three qualitative research methods were employed. First, using purposive sampling, ten semi-structured interviews were conducted with committee members and volunteers at various stages throughout the programme's first term. Second, participant observations were conducted during and after all committee meetings, general staff meetings and training sessions, and during each of the four lessons. Third, qualitative content analysis was employed to examine the programme's curriculum. The data was analysed largely inductively, but in the light of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks. The findings reveal a number of factors which, it is argued, detract from the intervention's potential for empowerment and the collective renegotiation of social identities (identified as 'key preconditions for programme success' (Catherine Campbell and Catherine MacPhail, 2002:331). These include a lack of structure and theoretical grounding, the absence of a needs-based approach, a lack of ownership, the adoption of a didactic teaching style and the decontextualised nature of the intervention. In addition to providing insight to the specific programme under evaluation, the study contributes to the body of understanding on evaluation research generally through demonstrating and discussing the types of insights that can be gained through the application of process evaluation. The findings demonstrate the way in which process evaluation first, allows for problems to be noticed as they occur and, second, provides the necessary foundation for an evaluation of outcome. It is argued that a process evaluation that takes account processual, theoretical and pedagogical factors has the capacity to respond to the complexity of the HIV/AIDS epidemic and thus can enable the development of more appropriate, comprehensive, and effective HIV/AIDS interventions. 2014-10-31T17:55:20Z 2014-10-31T17:55:20Z 2009 Master Thesis Masters MPhil http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8990 eng application/pdf Aids and Society Research Unit Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS and Society
Reed, Jenny
The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes
title_full The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes
title_fullStr The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes
title_full_unstemmed The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes
title_short The utility of process evaluation : understanding HIV/AIDS prevention programmes
title_sort utility of process evaluation understanding hiv aids prevention programmes
topic HIV/AIDS and Society
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8990
work_keys_str_mv AT reedjenny theutilityofprocessevaluationunderstandinghivaidspreventionprogrammes
AT reedjenny utilityofprocessevaluationunderstandinghivaidspreventionprogrammes