Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour

Includes bibliographical references (leaves 159-168).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Poole, Jennifer Amy Forbes
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Linguistics 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613298899288064
access_status_str Open Access
author Poole, Jennifer Amy Forbes
author_browse Poole, Jennifer Amy Forbes
author_facet Poole, Jennifer Amy Forbes
author_sort Poole, Jennifer Amy Forbes
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 159-168).
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8993
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:55.830Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Linguistics
publisherStr Linguistics
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8993 Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour Poole, Jennifer Amy Forbes Linguistics Includes bibliographical references (leaves 159-168). Due to certain fundamental flaws, orthodox linguistics has not succeeded in producing a coherent account of 'schizophrenic language' - the host of symptoms that are alternatively characterised as evidence of formal thought disorder or labelled as disorganised speech, a disorder in itself. The most important of these flaws are its treatment of languages as fixed codes, which doubles as an explanation of how linguistic communication works, and its postulation of the mental structures that would be necessary if languages were indeed fixed codes, and communication a matter of encoding and decoding messages. In particular, orthodox linguistics has bolstered the now-dominant neo-Kraepelinian, biomedical account of schizophrenia, which treats utterances as symptoms that give clues to brain (dis)organisation and (dys) function. Integrational linguistics, which criticises the culturally based assumptions - collectively referred to as 'the language myth' - that are at the heart of the orthodox account of languages and language, provides an alternative. It sympathises with the growing trend in cognitive science and philosophy towards 'embodiment' and 'distributed cognition', which recognises that encultured entities like languages, minds, brains, bodies, and world are intrinsically defined by their co-evolution in the species, and co-emergence during an individual's development. Integrationists argue that by focusing in the first instance on second-order cultural constructs called 'languages', orthodox linguistics fails to give an account of the first-order experience of language users. This thesis approaches the topic of 'schizophrenic language' from a broadly integrationist perspective in order to demonstrate that because orthodox linguistics is so widely taken for granted in psychiatry, its biases inform current mainstream accounts of schizophrenic language, motivate the outright dismissal of interpersonal accounts, past and present, and provide a skewed picture of the phenomenon it purports to be describing, by ultimately constructing an individual-focused, deficit-based account of what is not, as opposed to what is. That is, by holding up orthodox linguistics' idealised version of communication and speakers (which has little applicability even to 'normal' language users), it uses deviation from the ideal as description and explanation, rather than recognising the strategies actually employed by schizophrenics in their attempts to make sense, even if these attempts fail. The alternative argued for here is to apply the tenets of integrationist linguistics to schizophrenic language behaviour, to give a fuller account of communication situations involving schizophrenics and normal interlocutors. As a result, this thesis calls for a reformulation of the idea that incomprehensibility stems from deviant speech, itself the product of an irrational brain. 'Sense', 'deviance' and 'irrationality' are a moment-to-moment metalinguistic appraisals made by language users, second-order cultural constructions that shape the speech community's response to certain individuals. Describing the speech of schizophrenics as 'deviant', 'irrational', or 'nonsensical' constrains their jointly-constructed capability of making sense using the resources (which may include other individual's minds) at their disposal. Integration linguistics thus brings into focus a moral and political dimension to such descriptions which is obscured by an orthodox linguistics-biased biomedical approach. 2014-10-31T17:57:29Z 2014-10-31T17:57:29Z 2009 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8993 eng application/pdf Linguistics Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Linguistics
Poole, Jennifer Amy Forbes
Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour
title_full Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour
title_fullStr Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour
title_short Challenging common sense about nonsense : an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour
title_sort challenging common sense about nonsense an integrational approach to schizophrenic language behaviour
topic Linguistics
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8993
work_keys_str_mv AT poolejenniferamyforbes challengingcommonsenseaboutnonsenseanintegrationalapproachtoschizophreniclanguagebehaviour