Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime
Includes bibliographical references.
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Commercial Law
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613222222168064 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Ward, Grant |
| author2 | Emslie, Trevor |
| author_browse | Emslie, Trevor Ward, Grant |
| author_facet | Emslie, Trevor Ward, Grant |
| author_sort | Ward, Grant |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Includes bibliographical references. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9153 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:32:42.829Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateRange | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Department of Commercial Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Commercial Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9153 Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime Ward, Grant Emslie, Trevor Tax Law Includes bibliographical references. In the 2010 Budget review The South African National Treasury announced it intended to create a business environment that would promote South Africa as a gateway to investment into Africa.1 As such a headquarter company regime would be considered. With globalisation and free movement of capital internationally countries are pursuing holding company regimes to attract investment to, and through, their shores. At the forefront are countries such as Belgium, Denmark, Luxemburg, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore and the United Kingdom.2 Following the 2010 Budget review South Africa has now joined this group. 2014-11-05T03:53:39Z 2014-11-05T03:53:39Z 2014 Thesis Postgraduate Diploma PGDip http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9153 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Tax Law Ward, Grant Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime |
| title | Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime |
| title_full | Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime |
| title_fullStr | Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime |
| title_short | Investing into africa: comparison between South African headquarter company and Mauritian GBC1 regime |
| title_sort | investing into africa comparison between south african headquarter company and mauritian gbc1 regime |
| topic | Tax Law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9153 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wardgrant investingintoafricacomparisonbetweensouthafricanheadquartercompanyandmauritiangbc1regime |