Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review

Includes bibliographical references.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Draper, Beverly
Other Authors: Hoffman, Margaret
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Health and Family Medicine 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613151186386944
access_status_str Open Access
author Draper, Beverly
author2 Hoffman, Margaret
author_browse Draper, Beverly
Hoffman, Margaret
author_facet Hoffman, Margaret
Draper, Beverly
author_sort Draper, Beverly
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliographical references.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9339
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:34.243Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
publisherStr Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9339 Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review Draper, Beverly Hoffman, Margaret Public Health Includes bibliographical references. [Background] Two injectable progestogen-only contraceptives (IPCs) depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone oenanthate (NET-EN) continue to be extensively used in some countries, forming a large proportion of the health system's expenditure on contraception. Both these highly effective contraceptives receive wide acceptance amongst women in their fertile years. They differ in cost and frequently of administration. A systematic comparison was undertaken to investiage their rational use. [Objectives] To determine if there are differences between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate given at a dose of 150mg IM every three months and norethisterone oenathate given at a dose of 200mg IM every two months, in terms of contraceptive effectiveness, reversibility and discontinuation patterns, and adverse clinical effects. [Study Design] A Cochrane systematic review was used to answer the question posed in the research objective. This included a systematic search for all available literature comapring DMPA and NET-EN, followed by appraisal of all studies for inclusion in the review. Meta-analysis was then applied to the included study. 2014-11-07T13:49:28Z 2014-11-07T13:49:28Z 2006 Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9339 eng application/pdf Department of Public Health and Family Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Public Health
Draper, Beverly
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review
title_full Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review
title_fullStr Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review
title_short Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long-acting progestogenic contraception : a systematic review
title_sort depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus norethisterone oenanthate for long acting progestogenic contraception a systematic review
topic Public Health
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9339
work_keys_str_mv AT draperbeverly depotmedroxyprogesteroneacetateversusnorethisteroneoenanthateforlongactingprogestogeniccontraceptionasystematicreview