Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.

Bibliography: leaves 224-232.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Couve, Cyril
Other Authors: Faber, Philip
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Psychology 2014
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613322274144256
access_status_str Open Access
author Couve, Cyril
author2 Faber, Philip
author_browse Couve, Cyril
Faber, Philip
author_facet Faber, Philip
Couve, Cyril
author_sort Couve, Cyril
collection Thesis
description Bibliography: leaves 224-232.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9950
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:17.944Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Department of Psychology
publisherStr Department of Psychology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/9950 A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis. Couve, Cyril Faber, Philip Clinical Psychology Bibliography: leaves 224-232. This study aims at exploring and explicating a latent controversy in the psychoanalytic literature between the 'classical etiological formula' and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.The classical formula, which comprises Freud's original theses and subsequent contributions, is comprehensively reviewed and its particular depiction of the internal structure of obsessional neurosis is spelt out. Klein's writings on the topic, although they enjoy a definite status amongst certain contemporary writers, have never before been properly systematised. The comparison suggests that major contradictions exist between the two viewpoints. 2014-12-10T08:14:09Z 2014-12-10T08:14:09Z 1982 Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9950 eng application/pdf Department of Psychology Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Clinical Psychology
Couve, Cyril
A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.
title_full A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.
title_fullStr A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.
title_full_unstemmed A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.
title_short A critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the Kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis.
title_sort critical comparison and evaluation of the classical etiological formula and the kleinian viewpoint on obsessional neurosis
topic Clinical Psychology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/9950
work_keys_str_mv AT couvecyril acriticalcomparisonandevaluationoftheclassicaletiologicalformulaandthekleinianviewpointonobsessionalneurosis
AT couvecyril criticalcomparisonandevaluationoftheclassicaletiologicalformulaandthekleinianviewpointonobsessionalneurosis