Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Tree size structure of tectona grandis (Linn f.) stand in hilltop and valley-bottom of Omo Forest Reserve
Variability of a microsite contributes to the size hierarchy in tree populations. Tree size symmetry varies with the available growth resources. However, competition hierarchy may not cause size symmetry in tree populations. The identification of mechanisms that determine size hierarchy has ecologic...
Saved in:
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Published: |
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000njm a2000000a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/11165 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 720 | |a Falade, O. F. |e author | ||
| 720 | |a Oguntona, S. B. |e author | ||
| 260 | |c 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Variability of a microsite contributes to the size hierarchy in tree populations. Tree size symmetry varies with the available growth resources. However, competition hierarchy may not cause size symmetry in tree populations. The identification of mechanisms that determine size hierarchy has ecological significance in the management of a forest stand. Therefore, this study investigated the tree size structure of the Teak stand in the Hilltop and Valley-Bottom stands of the Omo Forest Reserve. A ten-year-old Teak plantation was delineated into Hilltop and Valley-Bottom stands based on topography. Five (30m x 30m) sample plots were systematically demarcated on 1 km transects in each stand. Tree stems with diameter at breast height (dbh) ≥ 10 cm were enumerated. Diameter at breast height and total height were measured using Girth tape and Spiegel Relaskop. Stem size inequality, diversity and stand attributes of both stands were evaluated for diameter and height. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive, correlation, regression analysis and t-test at α 0.05. Mean dbh and height in the Valley-Bottom stand (11.30 ± 4.82 cm dbh and 7.26 ± 3.21 m) were not significantly different from the Hilltop stand (10.19 ± 4.62 cm dbh and 7.12 ± 3.88 m). Stem density in the Hilltop stand (1431.0 stems/ha) was higher than in Valley-Bottom stand (1248.0 stems/ha). All distributions expressed unimodality, except the diameter distribution of the Valley-Bottom stand, which expressed bimodality. The inequality was strongly correlated with the diversity indices in dbh and height distributions in the Hilltop and Valley-Bottom stands, respectively. The same mechanism was responsible for the dbh and height structures of the Hilltop and Valley-Bottom stands, respectively. However, different mechanisms were responsible for the dbh and height structures of the Valley-Bottom and Hilltop stands, respectively. | ||
| 024 | 8 | |a 2673-4931 | |
| 024 | 8 | |a Environmental Science Proceeding 13(21), pp. 1-10 | |
| 024 | 8 | |a ui_art_falade_tree_2022 | |
| 024 | 8 | |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/11165 | |
| 653 | |a Size diversity indices | ||
| 653 | |a Stem size hierarchy | ||
| 653 | |a Elevation gradient | ||
| 653 | |a Inequality measures | ||
| 653 | |a Stem diameter | ||
| 653 | |a H-D allometry | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Tree size structure of tectona grandis (Linn f.) stand in hilltop and valley-bottom of Omo Forest Reserve |