Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Decision-to-Delivery intervals and perinatal outcome following emergency cesarean delivery in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

"Objective: To determine the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) for emergency cesarean deliveries (CDs) at a tertiary center in Nigeria, to evaluate causes of delay, and to assess the effects of delays on perinatal outcomes. Methods: Between September and November 2010, a prospective, observational...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/11774
042 |a dc 
720 |a Bello, F. A.  |e author 
720 |a Tsele, T. A.  |e author 
720 |a Oluwasola, T. A. O.  |e author 
260 |c 2016 
520 |a "Objective: To determine the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) for emergency cesarean deliveries (CDs) at a tertiary center in Nigeria, to evaluate causes of delay, and to assess the effects of delays on perinatal outcomes. Methods: Between September and November 2010, a prospective, observational study was undertaken at University College Hospital, Ibadan. Events that occurred after a decision to perform an emergency CD were recorded. Associations between outcomes and the DDI were analyzed. Results: Among 235 emergency CDs included,5 (2.1%) occurred within 30 minutes and 86 (36.6%)within 75 minutes. The mean DDI was 119.2±95.0minutes. Among CDs with a DDI of more than 75 minutes, logistic factors were the reason for delay in 65 (43.6 %) cases. No significant associations were recorded between DDI and the 5-minute Apgar score, admission to the special-care baby unit, or perinatal mortality (P N 0.05 for all). In multivariate analysis, neonates delivered after 75 minutes were significantly less likely to die during the perinatal period than were those delivered within this period (odds ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.66; P = 0.01). Conclusion: Institutional delays in CDs need to be addressed. However, the DDI could be less important for perinatal outcome than are some other factors, such as the severity of the indication. " 
024 8 |a 0020-7292 
024 8 |a ui_art_bello_decision_2015 
024 8 |a International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 130(2), pp. 279 – 283 
024 8 |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/11774 
653 |a Cesarean delivery 
653 |a Decision-to-delivery 
653 |a Interval Perinatal mortality 
653 |a Perinatal outcomes 
245 0 0 |a Decision-to-Delivery intervals and perinatal outcome following emergency cesarean delivery in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.