Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Histopathology turnaround time of surgical biopsies in a Nigerian tertiary health-care facility

Background: Turnaround time (TAT) analysis is finding increasing relevance in clinical laboratories due to its relevance in the quality of care of patients. TAT involves all the various processes that occur within the laboratory. Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the histopathology TAT of s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/12046
042 |a dc 
720 |a Ajani, M. A.  |e author 
720 |a Adegoke, O. O.  |e author 
720 |a Nwanji, I. D.  |e author 
720 |a Nwadiokwu, J. I.  |e author 
260 |c 2021 
520 |a Background: Turnaround time (TAT) analysis is finding increasing relevance in clinical laboratories due to its relevance in the quality of care of patients. TAT involves all the various processes that occur within the laboratory. Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the histopathology TAT of surgical biopsies at the Department of Pathology, University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1085 samples received at the Department of Pathology, UCH, Ibadan, from January to April 2020. Samples were categorized into small, intermediate, and large sizes. Average duration spent in the grossing room, processing, reporting, and result verification was calculated, and the total TAT was determined from the summation of the duration of these processes. Results: The mean TAT for all samples was 22 days(±10 days). Reception grossing, histological processing, reporting, and transcription accounted for an average of 1.5 (7%), 5.9 (27%), 9.1 (41%), and 5.6 (25%) days and percentage of TAT, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean TATs for small , intermediate-, and large-sized samples. Conclusion: We identified reporting time as the largest contributor to TAT. Other areas of delay were noted at tissue processing and result verification. Adoption of new technology and staff orientation may help to reduce the observed TAT. 
024 8 |a 1115-2613 
024 8 |a 2667-0526 
024 8 |a ui_art_ajani_histopathology_2021 
024 8 |a Nigerian Journal of Medicine 30(3), pp. 326-328 
024 8 |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/12046 
653 |a Grossing 
653 |a Reporting 
653 |a Tissue processing 
653 |a Turnaround time 
245 0 0 |a Histopathology turnaround time of surgical biopsies in a Nigerian tertiary health-care facility