Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Can common carotid intima media thickness serve as an indicator of both cardiovascular phenotype and risk among black Africans?
Background: It is not known whether common carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) can serve as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk among black Africans. Therefore, we examined whether CIMT differed significantly among individuals with distinct cardiovascular phenotype and correlated significant...
Saved in:
| Format: | Article |
|---|---|
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Background: It is not known whether common carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) can serve as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk among black Africans. Therefore, we examined whether CIMT differed significantly among individuals with distinct cardiovascular phenotype and correlated significantly with traditional cardiovascular risk factors in a black African population Methods: CIMT was measured in 456 subjects with three distinct cardiovascular phenotypes – 175 consecutive Nigerian African stroke patients, 161 hypertensive patients without stroke and 120 normotensive non-smoking adults. For each pair of cardiovascular phenotypes, c-statistics were obtained for CIMT and traditional vascular risk factors (including age, gender, weight, waist circumference, smoking, alcohol, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, fasting plasma glucose, fasting total cholesterol). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to quantify bivariate relationships. Findings: Bilaterally, CIMT was significantly different among the three cardiovascular phenotypes (right: p < 0.001, F ¼ 33.8; left: p < 0.001, F ¼ 48.6). CIMT had a higher c-statistic for differentiating stroke versus normotension (c ¼ 0.78 right; 0.82 left, p < 0.001) and hypertension versus normotension (c ¼ 0.65 right; 0.71 left, p < 0.001) than several traditional vascular risk factors. Bilaterally, combining all subjects, CIMT was the only factor that correlated significantly (right: 0.12 r 0.41, 0.018 p < 0.0001; left: 0.18 r 0.41, 0.005 p < 0.0001) to all the traditional cardiovascular risk factors assessed. Conclusion: Our findings support CIMT as a significant indicator of both cardiovascular risk and phenotype among adult black Africans. However, specific thresholds need to be defined based on prospective studies. |
|---|