Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Hepatitis B Virus Serological Markers in a Rural Community in Southeastern Nigeria

Due to the current blood safety algorithm in Nigeria which excludes only Hepatitis B surface Antigenaemia (HBsAg) positive individuals from blood donation, this study was therefore designed to investigate HBV markers of infection in a rural population in southeastern Nigeria. It is a cross sectional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000njm a2000000a 4500
001 oai:repository.ui.edu.ng:123456789/12765
042 |a dc 
720 |a Bakarey, A. S.  |e author 
720 |a Ifeorah, I. M.  |e author 
720 |a Faleye, T. O. C.  |e author 
720 |a Adewumi, M. O.  |e author 
720 |a Akere, A.  |e author 
720 |a Omoruyi, C. E.  |e author 
720 |a Ogunwale, A. O.  |e author 
720 |a Olaleye, V. F.  |e author 
720 |a Awokunle, R. F.  |e author 
720 |a Sekoni, D.E.  |e author 
260 |c 2017 
520 |a Due to the current blood safety algorithm in Nigeria which excludes only Hepatitis B surface Antigenaemia (HBsAg) positive individuals from blood donation, this study was therefore designed to investigate HBV markers of infection in a rural population in southeastern Nigeria. It is a cross sectional community-based study. This study was carried out in Awuda village in Nnobi town of southeastern Nigeria in August 2013. A total of 92 consenting participants were enrolled for the study. The participants were screened for HBsAg, HBeAg, Anti-HBc IgM, Anti-HBc, Anti-HBe and Anti-HBs using ELISA technique and classified into different serological profiles indicative of infection stages. Respondents’ mean age was 26.3(SD +11.5) years and 58 of them were females while 34 were males. An overall prevalence for HBsAg was 1.1% (1/92). The same HBsAg positive individual also had detectable anti-HBe and anti- HBc IgM. Analysis of the results showed 3 (3.3%) of the study participants were positive for both Anti-HBe and Anti-HBc. Also, 12 (13.0%) participants were positive for only Anti-HBc and Anti-HBs antibody. Another 9 (9.8%) participants were positive for only Anti-HBs while 51 (55.0%) had no serological marker for previous exposure to either HBV or HBV vaccine. Altogether, 31(33.7%), 1(1.1%) and 21(22.8%) participants were positive for HBc, HbcIgM and HBs antibodies respectively. This study has demonstrated that at least 1 out of every 3 people in the studied community might have serological evidence of present or past HBV infection. The current dependence of blood safety algorithms which excludes only HBsAg positive individuals is not enough to guarantee safety of blood and/or blood products. More studies are needed to further investigate the theoretical basis of the algorithm. 
024 8 |a 2231-0614 
024 8 |a ui_art_bakarey_hepatitis_2017 
024 8 |a British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research 21(1), pp. 1–9 
024 8 |a https://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/12765 
653 |a HBV markers 
653 |a serological profiles 
653 |a safety algorithm 
653 |a rural 
653 |a Nigeria 
245 0 0 |a Hepatitis B Virus Serological Markers in a Rural Community in Southeastern Nigeria